Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:22:58.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Theory of E.C.T. Action and its Bearing on the Biological Significance of Epilepsy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Martin Roth
Martin Roth*
Affiliation:
From the Department of Clinical Research, Graylingwell Hospital, Chichester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The starting-point of the line of thought to be pursued here was some work reported in detail elsewhere (Roth, 1951), on the changes in the electrical activity of the brain produced by electro-convulsive therapy. When the findings were related to the known clinical and physiological effects of E.C.T. three converging lines of evidence could be discerned:

(1) The Changes in the Electrical Activity of the Brain Produced by E.C.T. and their Significance.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 98 , Issue 410 , January 1952 , pp. 44 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1952 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Altschule, M. D., Cram, A. B., and Tillotson, K. J., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1948, 59, 29.Google Scholar
Bini, L., Rassegna di neuropsichiat., 1947, 1, 11.Google Scholar
Von Brücke, quoted by Franklin, K. J., Brit. Med. J., 1951, i, 1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, F., C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 1935, 118, 1235.Google Scholar
Idem , Bull. Acad. Med. Belg., 1937, 68.Google Scholar
Cerletti, U., Riv. Sper. di Freniat., 1942, 64, 209.Google Scholar
Idem , Congrès International de Psychiatrie, Paris, 1950. IV : Thérapeutique Biologique, 1.Google Scholar
Davies, H., E.E.G. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1950, 2, 243.Google Scholar
Delay, J., L'Electro-Choc et la Psycho-Physiologie, 1946. Paris : Masson.Google Scholar
Idem , and Maillard, J., Ann. Méd.-Psychol., 1945, 5, 474.Google Scholar
Iidem , Semaine d. hôp. Paris, 1946, 22, 967.Google Scholar
Earl Walker, , E.E.G. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1949, 1, 451.Google Scholar
Ewald, G., Allg. Z. Psychiat., 1938, 110, 153.Google Scholar
Idem and Haddenbrock, S., Z. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1942, 174, 626.Google Scholar
Freed, H., Spiegel, E., and Wycis, H. T., Psychiat. Quart., 1949, 23, 227.Google Scholar
Gamper, E., Zentralbl. Neurol. Psych., 1927, 47, 830.Google Scholar
Gellhorn, E., New York. Interscience Publications, 1943.Google Scholar
Idem , Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1949, 42, Suppl. 55.Google Scholar
Gibbs, F. A., Lennox, W. G., and Gibbs, E. L., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1936, 36, 1225.Google Scholar
Hill, D., Fol. Psychiat. Neurol. Neurochir. Neerland. Congresnummer, 1948, 1/2, 95.Google Scholar
Hunter, J., and Jasper, H. H., E.E.G. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1949, 1, 305.Google Scholar
Jasper, H. H., ibid., 1949, 1, 405.Google Scholar
Idem and Fortuyn, J., Res. Publ. A. Nerv. and Ment. Dis., 1946, 26, 272.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G., Brit. Med. J., 1943, i, 1.Google Scholar
Idem , Brit. Med. Bull., 1950, 6, 333.Google Scholar
Kalinowsky, L. B., and Hoch, P. H., Shock Treatments, 1947. London : Heinemann.Google Scholar
Keeser, E., and Keeser, I., Arch. f. exp. Path. u. Pharm., 1928, 127, 230.Google Scholar
Lindsley, D. B., Bowden, J. W., and Magoun, H. W., E.E.G. Clin. NeurophysioL, 1949., 1, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meduna, L. J., “L'électrochoc,” Congrès International de Psychiatrie, Paris, 1950. IV: Thérapeutique Biologique, “Indications respectives des Méthodes de Choc,” 135–161.Google Scholar
Meyer, A., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1944, 7, 66.Google Scholar
Moriarty, J. D., and Siemens, J. C., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1947, 57, 712.Google Scholar
Morison, R. S., Dempsey, E. W., and Morison, B. R., Amer. J. Physiol., 1941, 131, 732.Google Scholar
Iidem , ibid., 1941, 131, 744.Google Scholar
Morison, R. S., and Dempsey, E. W., ibid., 1942, 135, 281.Google Scholar
Iidem , ibid., 1943, 138, 297.Google Scholar
Moruzzi, G., and Magoun, H. W., E.E.G. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1949, 1, 455.Google Scholar
Penfield, W., and Erickson, T. C., Epilepsy and Cerebral Localization : A Study of the Mechanism, Treatment and Prevention of Epileptic Seizures. Springfield, Ill. : Thomas. 1941.Google Scholar
Pick, E. P., Wien. klin. Woch., 1927, 40, 1.Google Scholar
Pollock, G. H., Stein, S. N., and Gyarfas, K., Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. and Med., 1949, 70, 291.Google Scholar
Roth, M., 1951. In the Press.Google Scholar
Idem and Hetherington, R. R., “Psychological Changes Produced by E.C.T.” Communication to First International Congress of Psychiatry, 1950 (Section IV : Indications Respectives des Méthodes de Choc.)Google Scholar
Idem and Rosie, J. M., 1951. To be published.Google Scholar
Sargant, W., J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 135.Google Scholar
Van Harreveld, A., J. Neuropath. and Exper. Neurol., 1947, 6, 177.Google Scholar
Weil, A. A., and Brinegar, W. C., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1947, 57, 719.Google Scholar
Zubin, J., and Barrera, S. E., Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. and Med., 1941, 48, 596.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.