Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:31:21.591Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Syndrome of Alexia and Amnesic Aphasia. Subarachnoidal Haemorrhage with Symptom of Partial Occlusion of the Spinal Subarachnoidal Space

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

R. Klein*
Affiliation:
Bristol Mental Hospital

Extract

Amnesic aphasia has a peculiar position within the aphasic disorders, and it has always been found difficult to bring it into any aphasic scheme. The nearest to it in Head's (1926) classification of symbolic disorder is his nominal aphasia. This, however, is actually a sensory aphasia, in which the difficulty in finding words prevails; it has lost all the characteristics of the classical amnesic speech disorder. Goldstein (1926), on the other hand, while stressing the existence of the amnesic aphasia as a definite and well-circumscribed type of disorder, denies that it has anything to do with a speech defect—an opinion up to then held. According to him, it is fundamentally a defect in the thinking process in which the patients have sunk to a lower and more concrete level of behaviour. They have, according to Goldstein (1926), lost the categorical meaning and use of words; they may be able to name an object in a concrete situation, but are unable to generalize, to use the word in its class meaning. Since then this question has been critically examined by several authors (Hauptmann (1931), Isserlin (1936), von Kuenburg (1930), Lotmar (1933), Scheller (1938)) in the light of Goldstein's conception. In their conclusions, repudiating Goldstein's opinion, they reaffirmed the classical view of a basic speech disorder in the amnesic aphasia.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1948 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beringer, K., and Stein, J. (1930), Zeitschr. Neur. Psych., 123, 472.Google Scholar
Bonhoeffer, K. (1903), Arch. Psych., 37, 564.Google Scholar
Bramwell, E. (1905), Scot. Med. and Surg. J., 17, 15.Google Scholar
Brissaud, E. (1900), Rev. Neur., 8, 758.Google Scholar
Déjerine, J. (1892), Soc. de Biol., 4, 61.Google Scholar
Idem and Pélissier, (1914), L'encéphale, 9–11, N. 7, 1.Google Scholar
Idem and Thomas, A. (1904), Rev. Neur., 12, 655.Google Scholar
Dide, M., and Botcazo, (1902), ibid., 10, 676.Google Scholar
Ehrenwald, H. (1930), Ztschr. Neur. Psych., 123, 204.Google Scholar
Foix, C., and Masson, A. (1923), La Presse Med., 31i, 361.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K. (1926), Schweiz. Arch. Neur., 19, 3.Google Scholar
Idem and Gelb, A. (1918), Ztschr. Neur. Psych., 41, 1.Google Scholar
Hauptmann, A. (1931), Mon. Psych. Neur., 79, 302.Google Scholar
Head, H. (1926), Aphasia and Kindred Disorders of Spcech. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hinshelwood, J. (1895), Lancet, 2, 1564.Google Scholar
Isserlin, M. (1936), Ergebn. Physiol., 38, 574.Google Scholar
Janota, M. O., and Springlova, M. (1930), Rev. Neur., 2, 429.Google Scholar
Klein, R. (1933), Ztschr. Neur. Psych., 147, 383.Google Scholar
Kramer, F. (1928), Mon. Psych. Neur., 68, 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuenburg, M. von (1930), Arch. Psych., 76, 257.Google Scholar
Lotmar, F. (1933), Schweiz. Arch. Neur., 30, 85 and 322.Google Scholar
Massary, J. de (1932), L'encéphale, 27, 53, 134.Google Scholar
Paterson, I. V. (1905), Scot. Med. and Surg. J., 7, 21.Google Scholar
Pick, A. (1913), Die agrammatischen Sprachstörungen. J. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Pötzl, O. (1927), Mon. Psych. Neur., 66, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem (1928), Die Aphasielehre. Deuticke, Leipzig u. Wien.Google Scholar
Ranschburg, P., and Schill, E. (1932), Ztschr. Neur. Psych., 139, 192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheller, A. (1938), Mon. Psych. Neur., 100, 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisenburg, Th., and McBride, K. E. (1935), Aphasia. New York.Google Scholar
Wolpert, J. (1930), Mon. Psych. Neur., 75, 207.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.