Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:26:28.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Study on the Symptomatology and Differential Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Pick's Disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

E. Stengel*
Affiliation:
Royal Edinburgh Hospital for Nervous and Mental Diseases

Extract

Many problems concerning Alzheimer's disease and Pick's disease are still awaiting clarification. In this country Henderson was the first to draw attention to the considerable importance of Alzheimer's disease in clinical psychiatry. Valuable work has been contributed by various writers in recent years (Grunthal, 1936; Critchley, 1929, 1930, 1931, 1938; Schottky, 1932; Thorpe, 1932; Rothschild, 1934; Malamud, Lowenberg and co-workers, 1929; Mayer-Gross, 1938; Kasanin and Crank, 1933; Jervis and Soltz, 1936; McMenemy, a.o., 1939). While Pick's disease has retained its position as a clinical entity based mainly on the characteristic anatomical picture, the position of Alzheimer's disease in the system of psychiatry has become more complicated; for instance atypical cases have been described presenting the anatomical characters of Alzheimer's disease, though not fitting into the original clinical conception of that disease. Lowenberg and his co-workers (1929) are inclined to regard Alzheimer's disease as a syndrome rather than a clinical entity. Many contributors have directed their main interest to the pathological changes. The knowledge of the symptomatology of those conditions is still incomplete. Further intensive study may enable us not only to base the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease and Pick's disease on more solid clinical knowledge than hitherto, but also to recognize the early stages of those diseases before advancing cerebral degeneration effaces their characteristic clinical features. Unfortunately, most of the cases come under the observation of the psychiatrist only in the later stages of their illness, and it seems that the comparatively small proportion of the mental hospital population they represent does not reflect the incidence of those diseases. It is very likely that many patients die from intercurrent illnesses before their mental condition is recognized or sufficiently advanced to make admission to a mental hospital necessary. The differential diagnosis of those conditions offers considerable difficulties which often may prove insuperable. Alzheimer's disease and Pick's disease have to be distinguished not only from each other but from conditions of vascular origin, from senile dementia and various atypical conditions which occur at the same age period during which Alzheimer's disease and Pick's disease usually develop. Only careful collection and analysis of clinical observations and their scrutiny by pathological investigations can increase our still limited knowledge in this important field of psychiatry.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1943 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bouton, S. M. (1940), J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 91, 9.Google Scholar
Critchley, M. (1929), J. Neur. Psychopath., 10, 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem (1930), Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 23, 533.Google Scholar
Idem (1938), ibid., 31, 1441.Google Scholar
Idem (1931), Lancet, 1, 1119, 1221, 1331.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. W. T. H. (1942), J. Ment. Sci., 88, 282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, W. (1933), Neuropathology. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Idem (1941). J.A.M.A., 117, 517.Google Scholar
Fulton, W. F. (1939), Physiology of the Nervous System. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gesell, A. (1941), The First Five Years of Life. London.Google Scholar
Gibbs, F. A., and Gibbs, E. L. (1941), Atlas of Electro-encephalography. Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K., and Katz, M. (1937), Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 38, 473.Google Scholar
Grunthal, E. (1936), Handb. Neur., 11, 466.Google Scholar
Hassin, G. B., and Levitin, D. (1941), Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 45, 814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemphill, R. E., and Stengel, E. (1941), J. Neur. Psychiat., 4, 97.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. K. (1941), “Presenile and Senile Psychoses” in Encyclopaedia of Medical Practice, ed. by Rolleston, , vol., 342.Google Scholar
Idem and Gillespie, R. D. (1940), A Text-book of Psychiatry. London.Google Scholar
Idem and MacLachlan, S. H. (1930), J. Ment. Sci., 76, 646.Google Scholar
Hertz, E., and Funfgeld, E. (1928), Arch. f. Psychiat., 93, 39.Google Scholar
Jervis, G. A., and Soltz, S. E. (1936), Am. J. Psychiat., 93, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, E., Lion, E. G., and Zimmermann, H. M. (1931), ibid., 95, 1027.Google Scholar
Kahn, E., and Thompson, M. (1934), ibid., 13, 1934.Google Scholar
Kasanin, J., and Crank, E. (1933), Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 30, 1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, M. (1936), Brain, 59, 494.Google Scholar
Lowenberg, K., and Rothschild, D. (1931), Am. J. Psychiat., 11, 269.Google Scholar
Lowenberg, K., and Waggoner, R. W. (1934), Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 31, 737.Google Scholar
Lowenberg, K., Boyd, D. K., and Salon, D. D. (1939), ibid., 41, 1004.Google Scholar
McMenemy, W. D. (1940), J. Neur. Psychiat., 3, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Worster-Drought, C., Flind, J., and Williams, H. G. (1939), ibid., 2, 293.Google Scholar
Idem and Pollak, E. (1941), Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 45, 683.Google Scholar
Malamud, W., and Lowenberg, K. (1929), ibid., 21, 805.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W. (1938), Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 31, 1443.Google Scholar
Nichols, I. C., and Weigner, W. C. (1938), Brain, 61, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothschild, D. (1934), Am. J. Psychiat., 91, 484.Google Scholar
Idem and Kasanin, J. (1936), Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 36, 293.Google Scholar
Schilder, P., and Stengel, E. (1931), ibid., 25, 598.Google Scholar
Schottky, J. (1932), Z. Neur., 140, 333.Google Scholar
Thorpe, F. T. (1932), J. Ment. Sci., 78, 302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, S. A. K. (1940), Neurology. London.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.