Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-01T18:28:02.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress Reactivity in Relation to Delinquent and Psychopathic Behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. E. Tong*
Affiliation:
Rampton Hospital, near Retford, Notts

Extract

Anxiety, either manifest or in the form of non-specific emotional disturbance, has been widely accepted as an operative factor in the personality structure of delinquent subjects (Aichhorn, 1; Burt, 5; Friedlander, 17; Stott, 53), and at present it appears that cognitive factors have little or no bearing upon the problem (Marcus, 43; Woodward, 61). By regarding anxiety or activated stress as a stimulus producing response (Hull, 24, 25; Miller, 45), delinquent behaviour has been postulated as learned responsiveness to anxiety or stress, which also functions as a learnable drive (Tong, 55). Previous investigations using Rorschach, persistence and galvanic skin response indices of anxiety or emotional disturbance have shown that there are significant variations according to both the nature of the conduct disorder (sex, violence, larceny, etc.), and ratings of stability (Tong, 54, 55). Different forms of conduct disorder are also known to carry different relapse potentialities, so that sex offenders, for example, are less likely to relapse than are larceny offenders (Mannheim and Wilkins, 42; Tong and Mackay, 60), although it is possible that different methods of treatment or disposal influence the likelihood of relapse for different sex offenders (Radzinowicz, 48). Prediction tables have been constructed for the purpose of more accurately assessing the most unstable offenders (42), and although such systems carry an encouraging degree of reliability it is apparent that greater reliability in prediction will only follow more accurate personality assessment than is possible by the use of impressionistic methods alone (58). Only knowledge of the relevant personality variables will lead to accurate assessment of change in subjects for whom the significant historical factors necessarily remain fixed. Furthermore, assessment techniques must be relatively unaffected by intelligence, education and rapport factors.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1959 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Aichhorn, A., Wayward Youth, 1925. London: Imago.Google Scholar
2. Altschule, M. D., Bodily Physiology in Mental and Emotional Disorders, 1953. New York: Grune and Stratton.Google Scholar
3. Baker, L. M., and Csapo, G. A., Amer. J. Psychol., 1955, 68, 3, 474.Google Scholar
4. Idem and Taylor, W. M., J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 48, 5, 361.Google Scholar
5. Burt, C., The Young Delinquent, 1944. London: University Press.Google Scholar
6. Clark, J. W., and Bindra, D., Canad. J. Psychol., 1956, 10, 69.Google Scholar
7. Davis, D. R., Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1954, 27, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Elithorn, A., Piercy, M. F., and Crosskey, M., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. and Psychiat., 1955, 18, 34.Google Scholar
9. Eysenck, H. J. Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
10. Idem, The Scientific Study of Personality, 1952. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
11. Idem, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 94.Google Scholar
12. Idem, J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 422, 28.Google Scholar
13. Idem, Dynamics of Anxiety and Hysteria, 1957. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
14. Farber, I. E., J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 38, 111.Google Scholar
15. Franks, C. M., J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 143.Google Scholar
16. Idem, Brit. J. Delinq., 1956, 6, 3, 192.Google Scholar
17. Friedlander, K., The Psycho-analytical Approach to Juvenile Delinquency, 1947. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co. Ltd.Google Scholar
18. Garst, J. B., and Stobin, E. K., A.M.A. Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1955, 74, 125.Google Scholar
19. Hall, K. R. L., Brit. J. Psychol., 1953, 44, 279.Google Scholar
20. Idem, Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 7, 2, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Idem and Stride, E., Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1954, 27, 48.Google Scholar
22. Hardy, J. D., Wolff, H. G., and Goodell, H., Pain Sensations and Reactions, Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
23. Hemphill, R. E., Hall, K. R. L., and Crookes, T. G., J. Ment. Sci., 1952, 98, 433.Google Scholar
24. Hull, C. L., The Principles of Behavior, 1943. New York: Appleton Century.Google Scholar
25. Idem , A Behavior System, 1952. New York.Google Scholar
26. Ivanov-Smolensky, J. G., Essays on the Pathophysiology of the Higher Nervous Activity, 1954. Moscow: Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
27. Jacobsen, E., Kehlet, H., Larsen, V., Munkvad, I., and Skinhoj, K., Acta Psychiat. et Neurol. Scand., 1955, 30, 4.Google Scholar
28. Jones, L. C. T., Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 6, 1, 12.Google Scholar
29. Kamin, L. J., Bindra, D., Clark, J. W., and Waksberg, H., Canad. J. Psychol., 1955, 9, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Kay, B., Brit. J. Delinq., 1954, 4, 4, 245.Google Scholar
31. Knopfelmacher, F., Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 5, 3, 108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Idem, ibid., 1953, 5, 4, 150.Google Scholar
33. Lacey, J. I., Bateman, D. E., and Vanlehn, R., Psychosom. Med., 1952, 14, 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Iidem, ibid., 1953, 25, 1.Google Scholar
35. Idem and Smith, R. L., Science, 1954, 120, 3130, 1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Iidem and Green, A., Psychosom. Med., 1955, 17, 3, 208.Google Scholar
37. Idem, Ann. New York Acad. Sci., 1956, 67, 123.Google Scholar
38. Idem and Lacey, B. C., Amer. J. Psychol., 1958, 71, 50.Google Scholar
39. Iidem , “The Relationship of Resting Autonomic Activity to Motor Impulsivity”, in The Brain and Human Behavior, 1958. Chap. 5. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
40. Lykken, D. T., J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1957, 55, 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41. Maier, N. R. F., Frustration: A Study of Behavior Without a Goal, 1949. London: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
42. Mannheim, H., and Wilkins, L. T., Prediction Methods in Relation to Borstal Training, 1955. London: H.M.S.O. Google Scholar
43. Marcus, B., Brit. J. Delinq., 1955, 6, 147.Google Scholar
44. Marquart, D. I., J. genet. Psychol., 1948, 39, 107.Google Scholar
45. Miller, N. E., “Learnable Drives and Rewards”, in Handbook of Experimental Psychology (ed. Stevens, S. S.), 1951. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
46. McCord, W., and McCord, J., Psychopathy and Delinquency; 1956. New York: Grune & Stratton.Google Scholar
47. Piercy, M., Elithorn, A., Pratt, R. T. C., and Crosskey, M., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. and Psychiat., 1955, 18, 155.Google Scholar
48. Radzinowicz, L., Sexual Offenders, 1957. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
49. Russell, R. W., and Steinberg, H., Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 7, 2, 67.Google Scholar
50. Sampson, H., and Bindra, D., J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 2, 256.Google Scholar
51. Soloman, R. L., and Wynne, L. C., Psychol. Rev., 1954, 61, 6, 353.Google Scholar
52. Stengel, E., Oldham, A. J., and Ehrenberg, A. S. C., J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 422, 52.Google Scholar
53. Stott, D. H., Delinquency and Human Nature, 1950. Dunfermline: Carnegie Trust.Google Scholar
54. Tong, J. E., Brit. J. Delinq., 1955, 5, 4, 304.Google Scholar
55. Idem , Brit. J. Psychol., 1957, 48, 1, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56. Idem , Stress Reactivity, 1958. Univ. Sheffield Library.Google Scholar
57. Idem , Psychometric. Res. Bull. II, 1958.Google Scholar
58. Idem , Bull. Brit. Psych. Soc., 1959, 37, 36.Google Scholar
59. Idem , ibid., 1959, 37, 6a.Google Scholar
60. Idem and Mackay, G. W., Brit. J. Delinq., 1959, 9, 4, 27b.Google Scholar
61. Woodward, M., ibid., 1955, 5, 4, 281.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.