Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:33:28.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Factors Affecting Reaction Times to Auditory Stimuli in Mental Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

K. R. L. Hall  and
E. Stride
K. R. L. Hall
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Barrow Hospital, Bristol
E. Stride
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Barrow Hospital, Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A number of studies on reaction time (R.T.) latency to visual and auditory stimuli in psychotic patients has been reported since the first investigations on the personal equation were carried out. The general trends from the work up to 1943 are well summarized by Hunt (1944), while Granger's (1953) review of “Personality and visual perception” contains a summary of the studies on R.T. to visual stimuli.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 100 , Issue 419 , April 1954 , pp. 462 - 477
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1954 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellis, C. J., Proc. Soc. Exper. Biol. Med., 1933, 30, 801.Google Scholar
Davis, D. R., Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1952, 25, 104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, G., J. Exp. Psychol., 1945, 35, 153.Google Scholar
Franz, S. I., Amer. J. Psychol., 1906, 17, 38.Google Scholar
Granger, G. W., J. Ment. Sci., 1953, 99, 8.Google Scholar
Hall, K. R. L., and Stride, E., Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1954. To appear.Google Scholar
Henmon, V. A. C., and Wells, F. L., Psychol. Rev., 1914, 21, 153.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L., Principles of Behavior, 1943. New York.Google Scholar
Hunt, J. Mc. V., Psychological Deficit. Ch. 32 in: Personality and the Behaviour Disorders, 1944, New York.Google Scholar
Huston, P. E., Shakow, D., and Riggs, L. A., J. Gen. Psychol., 1937, 16, 39.Google Scholar
Idem, and Senf, R., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1952, 109, 131.Google Scholar
Ivanov-Smolensky, A. G., J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1928, 67, 346.Google Scholar
Lemmon, V. W., Arch. Psychol. (N. Y.), 1927, 15, 38.Google Scholar
Lundholm, H., J. Abn. Psychol. 1922, 17, 292.Google Scholar
Miles, W. R., Psychol. Rev., 1933, 40, 99.Google Scholar
Misiak, H., J. Exp. Psychol., 1947, 37, 318.Google Scholar
Obrist, W. D., J. Psychol, 1953, 35, 259.Google Scholar
Rodnick, E. H., and Shakow, D., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1940, 97, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, E. B., and Isaacs, S., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1929, 9, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scripture, E. W., J. Ment. Sci., 1916, 62, 698.Google Scholar
Wells, F. L., and Kelley, C. M., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1922, 2, 53.Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. S., Experimental Psychology, 1938. New York.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.