Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T21:43:22.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some EEG Findings in Old Age and Their Relationship to Affective Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

R. Maggs  and
E. C. Turton
R. Maggs
Affiliation:
Hellingly Hospital, Hailsham, Sussex
E. C. Turton
Affiliation:
Barrow Hospital, near Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The significance of the electro-encephalographic variations found in old age is not well defined and hence the value of this form of investigation as a prognostic measure is doubtful. Apart from a few papers such as Mengoli (1952), Mundy-Castle et al. (1954) and Obrist (1954), most of the published work contains no reference to findings obtained from a control series of persons of similar age and not suffering from a definite disability. This absence of definite criteria in respect of the EEG findings in records taken from apparently healthy elderly persons is important both as regards clear-cut abnormalities and also in reference to minor variations of doubtful significance.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 102 , Issue 429 , October 1956 , pp. 812 - 818
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bagchi, B. K., Kooi, K. A., Hoobler, S. W., and Peet, M. M., Univ. of Michigan M. Bull. 1950, 16, 92.Google Scholar
Cohn, R., Clinical Electro-encephalography, 1949. New York: McGraw Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Davis, P. A., Dis. nerv. Sys., 1941, 2, 77.Google Scholar
Finley, K. H., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1944, 101, 194.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, M., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1944, 101, 82.Google Scholar
Hoch, P., and Kubis, J., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1941, 98, 404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberson, W. T., and Seguin, C. A., Psychosomat. Med., 1945, 7, 30.Google Scholar
Luce, R. A., and Rothschild, D., J. Geront., 1953, 8, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, W., and McClatchley, W. T., J. Ment. Sci., 1952, 98, 711.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., J. Ment. Sci., 1945, 91, 101.Google Scholar
Mengoli, G., EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1952, 4, 232.Google Scholar
Mundy-Castle, A. C., Hurst, L. A., Beerstecher, D. M., and Prinsloo, T., EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1954, 6, 245.Google Scholar
Obrist, W. D., J. Geront., 1951, 6, Supplement No. 3, 130.Google Scholar
Idem , EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1954, 6, 235.Google Scholar
Idem and Bissell, L. F., J. Geront., 1955, 10, 315.Google Scholar
Roth, M., and Morrissey, J. O., J. Ment. Sci., 1952, 98, 66.Google Scholar
Idem and Kay, D. W. K., J. Ment. Sci., 1956, 102, 141.Google Scholar
Sheridan, F. P., Yeager, C. L., Oliver, W. A., and Simon, A., J. Geront., 1955, 10, 53.Google Scholar
Silverman, A. J., Busse, E. W., Barnes, R. H., Frost, L. L., and Thaler, M. B., Geriatrics, 1953, 8, 370.Google Scholar
Strauss, H., and Greenstein, L., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1948, 59, 395.Google Scholar
Turton, E. C., Univ. of London M.D. Thesis, 1954.Google Scholar
Wagener, H. P., and Keith, N. M., Medicine, 1939, 18, 317.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.