Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T06:55:20.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Significance of Atrophy of the Testis in Schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

R. E. Hemphill
R. E. Hemphill*
Affiliation:
Bristol Mental Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In another paper in collaboration with Reiss and Taylor (1944) I have described and classified the state of testis function in schizophrenia, mental defect, and the common mental illnesses from an examination of specimens obtained by biopsy from 115 representative subjects, selected for adequate physical health and development. It was found convenient to classify all material in five grades according to the histological appearances. These have been fully described in our paper. In brief they indicate (1) complete normality, (2) normality with slight defects, (3) moderate atrophy, (4, 5) severe and very severe atrophy amounting in the worst cases to total loss of normal function. While we have regarded a Grade 3 specimen as significant in young subjects, it is probably not necessarily outside the normal expectation from the fourth decade upwards. Grades 4, 5 are, of course, indicative of a severe atrophying process at any age. In analysing the defects we noted and described degeneration of the seminiferous elements with changes in the tubular capsule. The basement membrane was affected first and principally, and underwent a form of hyaline degeneration. This, we felt, was the underlying cause of the atrophy of the seminiferous epithelium, and eventually led in many instances to complete destruction of lengths of the affected tubules. The interstitium was not subject to important change.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 90 , Issue 380 , July 1944 , pp. 696 - 709
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1944 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cotton, J. M., Lewis, N. D. C., and Egenhoer, A. W. (1940), Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 40, 891.Google Scholar
Edwards, E. A., Hampton, J. B., and Duntley, S. G. (1939), New Eng. J. Med., 220, 865.Google Scholar
Idem and Hubert, G. (1941), Endocrin., 28, 119.Google Scholar
Fraser, R. W., Forbes, A. P., Allbright, T., Sulkovitch, H., and Reifenstein, E. C. (1941), J. Clin. Endocrin., 1, 234.Google Scholar
Freeman, H., and Looney, J. M. (1935), Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 34, 956.Google Scholar
Grinker, R. R., and Serota, H. M. (1941), Am. J. Psychiat., 98, 385.Google Scholar
Hemphill, R. E., Reiss, M., and Taylor, A. L. (1944), J. Ment. Sci. 90, 681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, R. G. (1943), Psychosom. Med. J., 5, 3.Google Scholar
Kallman, F. J. (1938), The Genetics of Schizophrenia, p. 258. New York: J. J. Augustin.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, E. (1934), Text-book of Medical Psychology. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Langfeldt, G. (1937), The Prognosis in Schizophrenia, etc., p. 44. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, N. D. C. (1936), Research in Dementia Praecox. New York, 166. Nat. Comm. for Ment. Hygiene.Google Scholar
McCartney, J. C. (1929), Endocrin., 18, 63.Google Scholar
Morse, M. E. (1923), J. Neurol. and Psychopath., 4, 1 Google Scholar
Mott, F. W. (1919), Brit. Med. J., i, 655.Google Scholar
Reiss, M. (1940), J. Ment. Sci., 86, 767.Google Scholar
Stieve, H. (1930), Handbuch d. mikroscop. Anat. d. Menschen, 7, part 2. Berlin: Julius Springer.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.