Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:58:56.751Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relative Stability of Personality Measures Compared with Diagnostic Measures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

G. A. Foulds
G. A. Foulds*
Affiliation:
Runwell Hospital, Wickford, Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In previous investigations (Foulds and Caine, 1958 and 1959) psychoneurotic subjects were classified in terms of the presenting syndrome (Hysteria or Dysthymia) and of the personality type (hysteroid or obsessive) as rated by psychiatrists. It was found that some psychological test measurements differentiated between Hysterics and Dysthymics regardless of personality type; whilst other measures differentiated between hysteroid and obsessive personalities regardless of diagnosis. The successful measures were not, however, identical for men and women. It was argued that one of the advantages of this double classificatory system should be that we would have one set of measures—the diagnostic—which should vary with the patient's clinical condition and another set—the personality measures—which should remain relatively constant.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 105 , Issue 440 , July 1959 , pp. 783 - 787
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1959 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Foulds, G. A., Int. J. Soc. Psychiat., 1956. Spring.Google Scholar
Idem and Caine, T. M., J. Ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 722–731.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1959. (In the press.)Google Scholar
Franks, C. M., J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 143–150.Google Scholar
Idem , Rev. Psychol-appl., 1956, 6, 35–44.Google Scholar
Idem , Brit. J. Psychol., 1957, 48, 119–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigal, J. J., Star, K. H., and Franks, C. M., J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1958, 57, 143–148.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.