Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:23:04.194Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationships Between Some Aspects of Visual Imagery and the Alpha Rhythm

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

C. G. Costello  and
Peter Mcgregor
C. G. Costello
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, St. George's Hospital, Morpeth
Peter Mcgregor
Affiliation:
EEG Department, St. George's Hospital, Morpeth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Golla, Hutton and Grey Walter (1943) made an attempt to use the EEG as an objective means of assessing imagery. They concluded that there were three types of alpha rhythm which corresponded to three different kinds of imagery processes: M or minus type whose alpha rhythms were almost non-existent and who used mainly visual imagery in thinking; the P or persistent type whose alpha rhythms continue even during mental activity, and who used mainly vocal kinaesthetic imagery; the R or responsive type with a good resting alpha rhythm which blocked readily during mental activity, and whose imagery was mixed. Though they were attempting to find an objective means ofassessing imagery an ultimate appeal is made to introspection as a validating criterion, and the tasks given to the subjects were such as to present difficult problems in the way of introspection. For instance, they were asked to think over to themselves the story of Red Riding Hood, to think over to themselves their plans for some definite day, to think over the argument for and against some abstract proposition such as “honestyis the best policy” or “the existence of free will”. It is felt that if an attempt is to be made to find an objective means of assessing imagery some at tempt should first of all be made to control the kind of imagery that will be used.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 103 , Issue 433 , October 1957 , pp. 786 - 795
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1957 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barratt, P. E., Brit. J. Psychol., 1956, 47, 101.Google Scholar
Costello, C. G., J. Ment. Sci., 1956, 102, 507.Google Scholar
Drever, J., Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1955, 7, 91.Google Scholar
Gastaut, H., EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1957, 9, 1.Google Scholar
Golla, F., et al., J. Ment. Sci., 1943, 89, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R. A., Brit. J. Psychol., 1950, 41, 63.Google Scholar
Hildebrand, H. P., Doctor's dissertation, 1953. London.Google Scholar
Klein, G. S., and Krech, D., J. Pers., 1952, 21, 118.Google Scholar
Klopfer, B., et al., Developments in Rorschach Technique, Vol. 1, 1954. New York: World Book Co Google Scholar
McKellar, P., and Simpson, L., Brit. J. Psychol., 1954, 45, 266.Google Scholar
Petrie, A., Personality and the Frontal Lobes, 1952. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Google Scholar
Piaget, J., Play Dreams and Imitation, 1951. London: Heinemann Google Scholar
Sandler, J. A., Brit. J. Psychol., 1955, 46, 225.Google Scholar
Short, P. L., Brit. J. Psychol., 1953, 44, 38.Google Scholar
Idem and Walter, W. Grey, Electroenceph. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1954, 6, 29.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.