Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:42:17.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychiatry and Science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

George Van Ness Dearborn*
Affiliation:
U.S. Veterans' Hospital No. 81, New York City

Extract

Primitive brains and intelligences, whether in earliest man, utter savages, young children or the feeble-minded, find it difficult or impossible to handle abstractions fast and rationally; on the other hand, interest and skill in cerebrizing the abstract, pro tanto is an index of high intelligence. On this “perfectly good” psychological basis psychiatrists as a class are persons intelligent above the average, and properly may be so considered. Thus it may be assumed that if they do not continuously bring into use every available aid and contribution to their science (and probably most of them do not), it must be mostly due to lack of opportunity and of habituated interest. And that, of course, is the still obvious fact.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1928 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 An early article in this general direction was the writer's “Psychology in the Medical School,” in Science, n.s., xiv, 343 (1901), pp. 129136. Also “Medical Psychology,” Med. Record, N.Y., lxxv, 5 (1909), pp. 176–178. Also Influence of Joy, Boston, 1916 (Mind and Health Series), pp. xviii + 223.Google Scholar
2 A Syllabus of Lectures on the Relations of Mind and Body, 4th ed., Cambridge, 1920.Google Scholar
3 Hughes, Percy, “The Centre, Function and Structure of Psychology,” Journ. Philos., xxiv (1927), pp. 8595, 113–120, and 148–153. (A clear, sane voice crying in the wilderness and welter of systems of psychology.) Google Scholar
4 Dearborn, G. V. N., “The Determination of Intellectual Regression and Progression,” Amer. Journ. Psychiat., vi, 4 (April, 1927), pp. 725741. Also “An Aid in Psychiatric Diagnosis and Prognosis,” Brit. Journ. Med. Psychol., November, 1927, vii, 3, pp. 315–320.Google Scholar
5 Briffault, R., The Mothers: A Study of the Origins of Sentiments and Institutions, Macmillan, 1927, 3 volumes (2,400 pages).Google Scholar
6 See, for example, Dearborn, G. V. N., “A Few Notes on the Biology of Feeblemindedness,” Journ. Nerv. and Ment. Dis., in press.Google Scholar
7 Draper, George, The Human Constitution, 1924.Google Scholar
8 See Dearborn, G. V. N., Nerve-Waste, Health Education League Booklet No. 27, Boston, 1912.Google Scholar
9 Idem , “The Sthenic Index in Education,” Ped. Sem., xix, 2 (June, 1912), bibliography.Google Scholar
10 Proescher, F., and Arkush, A. S., Journ. Nerv. and Ment. Dis., 1927, lxv, pp. 569584.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.