Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:40:17.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Preliminary Experiment on Paranoid Delusions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

M. B. Shapiro
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, London
A. T. Ravenette
Affiliation:
County Borough of West Ham

Extract

The object of the experiment to be described in this paper, was to find out if it was possible to develop a systematic experimental investigation of paranoid delusions.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1959 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bartlett, D., and Shapiro, M. B., “Investigation and treatment of a reading disability in a dull child with severe psychiatric disturbances”, Brit. J. Educ. Psychol., 1956, 26, 180190.Google Scholar
2. Darwin, C., The Origin of Species, 1859. World Classics Edition, 1951. Oxford University Press Google Scholar
3. Gough, H. G., Manual California Personality Inventory, 1957. California: Consult. Psychologists’ Press Inc.Google Scholar
4. Lovinger, L., “Perceptual contact with reality in schizophrenia”, J. Abn. Soc. Psychol. 1956, 52, 1119.Google Scholar
5. Mayer-Gross, W., Slater, E., and Roth, M., Clinical Psychiatry, 1954. Cassell & Co Google Scholar
6. Raush, H. L., “Perceptual constancy in schizophrenics: I. Size constancy”, J. Person., 1952, 21, 176187.Google Scholar
7. Sanders, R., and Pacht, A. R., “Perceptual size constancy of known clinical groups”, J. Consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 410444.Google Scholar
8. Sandler, J., “Studies in psychopathology using a self-assessment inventory: I. The development and construction of the inventory”, Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 27, No. 3, 142145.Google Scholar
9. Shapiro, M. B., “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly: I. Initial experiments”, J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 99110.Google Scholar
10. Idem , “An experimental investigation of the block design rotation effect”, Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1954, 27, 8488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Idem , “Experimental method in the psychological description of the individual psychiatric patient”, Int. J. Soc. Psychiat., 1957, 3, 89102.Google Scholar
12. Idem and Nelson, E. H., “An investigation of an abnormality of cognitive function in a co-operative young psychotic”,J. Clin. Psych., 1955, 11, 244251.Google Scholar
13. Idem and Tizard, B., “Experimental Studies of a Perceptual Anomaly: VI. The Application of the ‘Peephole’ Analogy to the perception of Organic Psychiatric Patients”, J. Ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 792801.Google Scholar
14. Smock, C. D., “The relationship between test anxiety, threat expectancy and recognition threshold for words”, J. Pers., 1956, 25, 159175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Spence, D. P., “A new look at vigilance and defense”, J. Abn. Soc. Psych., 1957, 154, 103108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Sullivan, P. L., and Welsh, G. S., “A technique for objective configural analysis of MMPI profiles”, J. Consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 383388.Google Scholar
17. Taulbee, E. S., and Sisson, B. D., “Configurational analysis of MMPI profiles of psychiatric groups”, ibid., 1957, 21, 413417.Google Scholar
18. U.S. Department of Labour, “Guide to the use of the general aptitude test battery, Section III: Development”, 1954.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.