Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:32:20.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Porteus Maze Changes After Psychosurgery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

S. D. Porteus  and
A. L. Diamond
S. D. Porteus
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychology, University of Hawaii
A. L. Diamond
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Owing to the use of other therapeutic measures in mental hospitals, interest in brain operations undertaken for the relief of psychotic symptoms has fallen to a minimum. Hence, opportunities for studying the mental effects of such cerebral lesions are now practically non-existent. The investigation by Aaron Smith (1960) of the residual deficits as shown by the Porteus Maze Test in cases who had suffered topectomies eight years previously, as reported in this Journal in July, 1960, may very well be the last word on the subject. The time seems opportune, therefore, to make a brief summary of the results of a test that is now considered to be the most sensitive to frontal brain damage.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 108 , Issue 452 , January 1962 , pp. 53 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1962 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Eysenck, H. J., “A Dynamic Theory of Anxiety and Hysteria”, J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 28–51.Google Scholar
Hunt, , Thelma, , in Chapter 14 of Psychosurgery (1st edition), Freeman, , Walter, and Watts, James W., 1942. Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
Karpeles, Lotta M., “A Further Investigation of the Porteus Maze Test as a Discriminative Measure in Delinquency”, J. Appl. Psychol., 1932, 16, 427–437.Google Scholar
Landes, , Carney, , in Proceedings of the Third Research Conference on Psychosurgery (1951). Publn. No. 221, Washington: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
Idem , “The Frontal Lobes and Anguish”, J. Ment. and Nerv. Disease, 1952, 3, 203–214.Google Scholar
Loranger, Armand W., and Misiak, , Henryk, , “The Performance of Aged Females on Five Non-language Tests of Intellectual Functions”, J. Clin. Psychol., 1960, 16, 189–191.3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payne, R. W., Chapter 6 in Handbook of Abnormal Psychology, Eysenck, (Ed.), 1961. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Petrie, , Asenath, , Personality and the Frontal Lobes, 1952. Philadelphia: Blakiston.Google Scholar
Porteus, S. D., and Peters, H., “Maze Test Validation and Psychosurgery”, Genet. Psychol. Monogs., 1947, 56, 3–86.Google Scholar
Idem , The Porteus Maze Test: Recent Advances, 1955. Palo Alto, California: Pacific Books.Google Scholar
Idem , Qualitative Performance in the Maze Test, 1942. Vineland, N.J.: Smith Printing House. Google Scholar
Idem , Porteus Tests—The Vineland Revision, 1920. Vineland, N.J.: Smith Printing House. Google Scholar
Poull, L. F., and Montgomery, R. P., “The Porteus Maze as a Discriminative Measure in Delinquency”, J. Appl. Psychol., 1929, 13, 145–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Mary F., in Psychosurgery, Freeman, , Walter, and Watts, James W., (2nd edition), 1950. Springfield: Thomas.Google Scholar
Sheer, Daniel E., and Shuttleworth, , Margaret, , Chapter 9 in Psychosurgical Problems, Mettler, (Ed.), 1952. Philadelphia: Blakiston.Google Scholar
Smith, , Aaron, , “Changes in Porteus Maze Scores of Brain-operated Schizophrenics After an 8-Year Interval”, J. Ment. Sci., 1960, 106, 967–978.Google Scholar
Willett, R., Chapter 15 in Handbook of Abnormal Psychology, Eysenck, (Ed.), 1961. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.