Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T22:33:55.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Photoconvulsive Threshold in Depressive Illness and the Effect of E.C.T.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

M. V. Driver  and
M. D. Eilenberg
M. V. Driver
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, University of London
M. D. Eilenberg
Affiliation:
Maudsley Hospital, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Few techniques are available which have as their aim the quantitative determination of a physiological function of the human brain. Of these the photomyoclonic threshold has received most attention and numerous reports have appeared concerning findings in epilepsy, schizophrenia, other psychiatric conditions and normal controls (2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 14). The precise neuro-physiological meaning of the “threshold” is unknown but since the first publications of Gastaut (5) it has been widely assumed that the measure is one of diencephalic function and that a change in the latter can be detected by the resulting threshold change.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 106 , Issue 443 , April 1960 , pp. 611 - 617
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Altschule, M. D., Cram, J. E., and Tillotson, K. J., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1948, 59, 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bickford, R. G., and Daly, D., EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1951, 3, 378.Google Scholar
3. Brockman, R. J., Brockman, J. C., Jacobsohn, V., Gleser, G. C., and Ulett, G. A., Confinia Neurol., 1956, 16, 97.Google Scholar
4. Chamberlain, G. H. A., and Gordon-Russell, J., EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1953, 5, 169.Google Scholar
5. Gastaut, H., ibid., 1950, 2, 228, 249.Google Scholar
6. Idem and Hunter, J., ibid., 1950, 2, 263.Google Scholar
7. Gellhorn, E., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1949, 42 (Supplement), 55.Google Scholar
8. Hunter, J., and Ingvar, D. H., EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1955, 7, 39.Google Scholar
9. Kershman, J., ibid., 1951, 3, 377.Google Scholar
10. Leffman, H., and Perlo, V. P., ibid., 1955, 7, 61.Google Scholar
11. Leibermann, D. M., Hoenig, J., and Hacker, M., ibid., 1954, 6, 9.Google Scholar
12. Roth, M., ibid., 1951, 3, 261.Google Scholar
13. Roth, M., Kay, D. W. K., Shaw, J., and Green, J., ibid., 1957, 9, 225.Google Scholar
14. Smith, K., Ulett, G. A., and Johnson, L. C., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1957, 77, 528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Starzl, T. E., Niemer, W. T., Dell, M., and Forgrave, P. R., J. Neuropath. exp. Neurol., 1953, 12, 262.Google Scholar
16. Ulett, G. A., Brockman, J. C., Gleser, G., and Johnson, A., EEG Clin. Neurophysiol., 1955, 7, 597.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.