Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:58:38.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Personality Defects and Psychiatric Symptoms after Cerebrospinal Fever in Childhood: Meningococcal Encephalopathy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

M. Narasimha Pai*
Affiliation:
Mill Hill Emergency Hospital, London

Extract

Until quite recently the mortality from cerebrospinal spinal fever was considerable, and those who survived the illness were considered lucky to be alive at all. As a result of chemotherapy, which has already reduced the case mortality to less than 9 per cent., more and more persons are likely to recover and present new problems. That some of these survivors may continue to complain of symptoms which incapacitatate them for work for prolonged periods has been borne out by some recent contributions (Pai, 1944; Degen et al., 1945; MacKieth, 1945; Ballard and Miller, 1945). In a previous paper (Pai, 1945) it was pointed out that some of these symptoms were psychogenic in origin, and others probably physiogenic, due to organic changes in the brain. Among the latter symptoms were changes in personality, intellectual deterioration, mild but persistent depression, occasional disorders of conduct and pronounced tendencies to invalidism. As personality consists to a great extent of several patterns of behaviour acquired in infancy and childhood, it was decided to study a group of patients who had cerebrospinal spinal fever in early life, in order to determine to what extent this illness had contributed to the development or the warping of the personality in each patient.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1946 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abril, A. M. (1938), Arch. Med. Infant., 7, 193.Google Scholar
Adams, J. L. (1942), New Zealand Med. J., 41, 63.Google Scholar
Aronoff, D. N. (1926), Klin. Zh. Saratovsk. Univ., 5, 561.Google Scholar
Baker, C. G. (1934), Guy's Hosp. Rep., 84, 115.Google Scholar
Ballard, S. I., and Miller, H. G. (1945), Lancet, Sept. 1, p. 273.Google Scholar
Banks, H. S., and McCartney, J. E. (1942), ibid., 1, 222.Google Scholar
Borovsky, M. P. (1933), Illinois Med. J., 64, 532.Google Scholar
Boyd, W. (1940), The Pathology of Internal Diseases. London.Google Scholar
Bucy, H. S. (1937), J. Amer. Med. Ass., 109, 1007.Google Scholar
Degen, J. A. (1945), Brit. Med. J., 2, 243.Google Scholar
Dopter, C. (1909), Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol., 67, 74.Google Scholar
Idem (1921), L'Infection Meningococcique. Paris.Google Scholar
Fagge, , quoted by Foster and Gas kell.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. H., and Gilmour, J. R. (1939), Lancet, 2, 301.Google Scholar
Foster, and Gaskell, (1916), Cerebrospinal Fever. Cambridge University Press, p. 25.Google Scholar
Goeppert, (1928), Handbuch für Allgemeine Medizin, ed. Mohr, und Staehelin, .Google Scholar
Gordon, M. H., and Murray, E. G. (1915), J. R. Army Med. Corps, 25, 411.Google Scholar
Graham, J. R., and Wolff, H. G. (1938), Arch. Neurol. and Psychiot., 39, 737.Google Scholar
Grinker, R. R. (1937), Neurology, pp. 6, 68. Springfield, Ill. Google Scholar
Hague, D. V. (1940), Public Health, 53, 255.Google Scholar
Halstead, H. (1943), J. Ment. Sci., 89, 363.Google Scholar
Harries, E. H. R., and Mitman, M. (1944), Clinical Practice in Infectious Diseases, p. 304.Google Scholar
Harries, G. E. (1940), Lancet, 1, 565.Google Scholar
Idem (1942), Brit. Med. J., 2, 423.Google Scholar
Holmes, M. J. (1941), Med. J. Australia, 1, 541.Google Scholar
Joe, A. (1942), Edinburgh Med. J., 49, 628.Google Scholar
Katz, S. (1940), New York State J. Med., 40, 746.Google Scholar
Levy, S. (1940), South. Med. J., 33, 212.Google Scholar
Mackeith, S. A., Lt. Col., R.A.M.C. (1945), personal communication.Google Scholar
Marchand, L., and Petit, A. (1910), L'Encéph., 1.Google Scholar
Mutch, N. (1940), Guy's Hosp. Gazette, 54, 282.Google Scholar
Netter, A., and Debré, R. (1911), La Méningite Cérébro-spinale. Paris.Google Scholar
Northfield, D. W. C. (1938), Brain, 61, 133.Google Scholar
Pai, M. N. (1944), Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 37, 205.Google Scholar
Idem (1945), Brit. Med. J., 1, 289.Google Scholar
Idem (1945), J. Ment. Sci., 91, 215.Google Scholar
Pearson, M. M., and Burnstine, M. D. (1939), Arch. Neurol. Psych., 42, 775.Google Scholar
Pette, H. (1936), Handbuch der Neurologie, ed. Bumke, O. und Foerster, O. Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, L., Handbuch der Psychiatrie, ed. Bumke, , vol. iii, p. 406.Google Scholar
Pickering, G. W. (1933), Clin. Sci., 1, 77.Google Scholar
Idem (1939), Brit. Med. J., 1, 907.Google Scholar
Ray, and Wolff, (1940), Arch. Surg. Chicago, 41, 813.Google Scholar
Redlich, H., Handbuch der Psychiatrie, ed. Aschaffenburg, .Google Scholar
Rolleston, H. D. (1919), Lancet, 1, 541.Google Scholar
Rolleston, J. D., and Ronaldson, G. W. (1940), Infectious Diseases, 3rd. ed., p. 99. London.Google Scholar
Rosanoff, A. J. (1938), Manual of Psychiatry and Mental Hygiene. Sixth ed. New York and London.Google Scholar
Rundle, C. (1929), Ker's Infectious Diseases, p. 546. London.Google Scholar
Sainton, J., and Voisin, P. (1906), L'Encéph., 1.Google Scholar
Santo, F. (1939), Frankf. z. Path., 53, 105.Google Scholar
Slesinger, H. A. (1933), Penn. Med. J., 36, 327.Google Scholar
Todesco, J. M. (1940), Lancet, 2, 196.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C., and Wilson, G. S. (1936), The Principles of Bacteriology and Immunity, p. 1128, 2nd ed. Google Scholar
Voisin, P., and Paisseau, (1910), Bulletins et Mémoires de la Société médicale des hôpitaux de Paris. Google Scholar
Watson, L. D. (1941), New England J. Med., 225, 685.Google Scholar
Weir, T. W. H., and Vautier, C. K. (1942), Brit. Med. J., 1, 179.Google Scholar
Weygandt, W. (1905), Exp. Beiträge'z. Psych. d. Schlafes Z. f. P. Bd., 39, 1.Google Scholar
Wilson, , Kinnier, S. A. (1940), Neurology, 1, 32. London.Google Scholar
Wyllie, W. G. (1940), Practitioner, 144, 369.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.