Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:06:58.044Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Value of the Rorschach Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Arthur Guirdham
Arthur Guirdham*
Affiliation:
Bailbrook House, Bath; Brentwood Mental Hospital, Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

My aim in abstracting the material for this article from experiments with upwards of 350 subjects has been to offer a few additions to the deductions it is possible to make from the Rorschach test, and to criticize and evaluate its general aims. The number of subjects studied approached that from which Rorschach derived the conclusions embodied in his monograph Psychodiagnostik. Among these is a group of 100 normals, the investigation of which should afford an interesting combination with the findings obtained by P. E. Vernon from an equal number of similar subjects.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 81 , Issue 335 , October 1935 , pp. 848 - 869
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1935 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

∗ See later.Google Scholar

∗ For comparison within the Erlebnistypus the colour score (∑Fb) is computed mathematically by a single numeral, according to the scheme : FFb = ½, FbF = 1, primary Fb = 1½.Google Scholar

∗ These are where the blot is merely described, without any similarities it displays being commented on.Google Scholar

∗ E indicates equality of + and − forms.Google Scholar

∗ Estimated for 100 and 132 subjects respectively.Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.