^∗ It is but fair to state that this paper is an abstract of one written in 1862, as a sequel to two papers which appeared in the ‘Psychological Journal’ for 1863, and based on the Browne Prize Essay, Univ. Edin., 1860.Google Scholar

^† Dr. Pritchard.Google Scholar

^‡ Dr. Tuke, ‘Psychol. Med.,’ Bucknill and Tuke.Google Scholar

^§ ‘University Lectures.’Google Scholar

^‖ Unzer, p. 163. Translated for the Sydenham Society, by Dr. Laycock.Google Scholar

^∗ ‘Nervous Diseases of Women.’ p. 257.Google Scholar

^† Ben. Jonson, ‘The Magnetic Lady,’ act i. sc. iGoogle Scholar

^∗ Window, ‘Obscure Diseases,’ p. 652.Google Scholar

^† ‘Lond. and Edin. Monthly Jour.’ March, 1844.Google Scholar

^‡ ‘Nat. Hist, of Selborne’ p. 211.Google Scholar

^§ ‘Med. Times and Gazette,’ July 5, 1862.Google Scholar

^∗ Laycock, ‘Nerv. Diseases of Women,’ p. 254.Google Scholar

^† Prochaska (Unzer and P. on the Nerv. Syst.), translated for the Syden. Soc. by Dr. Laycock.Google Scholar

^∗ See a very valuable paper on this subject by Professor Laycock, ‘Jour. Psychol. Med.’ April, 1855.Google Scholar

^† The Rev. W. McHwaine, in the ‘Journal of Ment. Sci.’ for January, 1862, calls it Œnomania or Methyskomania.Google Scholar

^‡ Bucknill, ‘Jour, of Ment. Sei.,’ July, 1861.Google Scholar

^∗ ‘Med-Chir. Review’ April, 1862.Google Scholar

^† ‘Philos, of the Human Mind’ Part I, p. 78.Google Scholar

^‡ If structural lesion occurs in any of these cases of affection of the will or volition, we shall find it in the pons Varolii and cerebrum, according to Gerdy, Mueller, Lorget, and others; Brown-Séquard, however, localises it in the thalami optici and corpora striata. ‘Lectures on the Pbysiol and Pathol, of the Nerv. Syst.’ p. 228.Google Scholar

^∗ A very interesting case is given by Dr. W. T. Gairdnor in his ‘Clinical Medicine,’ p. 284 et seq.Google Scholar

^∗ ‘Medico-Legal Relat. of Intemp.’Google Scholar

^† Vide a paper “On the desirableness of some Legalised Arrangements for the Care and Treatment of Dipsomaniacs,” by Dr. A. Peddie, read before the Med.∗ Chir. Soc. of Edinburgh. ‘Edin. Med. Jour.,’ Feb. 1858.Google Scholar

^∗ Op. cit., p. 287.Google Scholar

^† Unzer, op. cit., p. 165.Google Scholar

^∗ Dr. Lay cock, ‘Nerv. Dis. on Women,’ p. 75.Google Scholar

^† ‘Leçons orales sur les Phrénopathies,’ vols, i and ii, p. 176.Google Scholar

^∗ [My friend Dr. Lauder Lindsay, in a paper published in the November number of the ‘Edinburgh Med. Jour.’ for 1865, uses the term “hysteromania” to designate the emotional features of a case of “temporary insanity,” apparently unaware of the very different meaning in which authors have used this word. Vide Guislain, ‘Lecons Orales,’ tom, i, p. 179, &c. Thus does he (Dr. Lindsay), while denouncing the prolix nature of modern scientific nosologies, propagate a similar error to that he attacks on the next page, in support of a mere business classification of insanity (founded on observations deduced from asylum reports), and which in its simplicity leaves out moral insanity altogether !—November, 1865.]Google Scholar

^∗ Appendix of cases to ‘Psychol. Medicine,’ by Bucknill and Tuke.Google Scholar

^† ‘Jour, of Prac. Med. and Surgery,’ Paris, February, 1858.Google Scholar

^∗ “Quid dicam quantus amor bestiarum sit in educandis custodiendisque iis, quæ procreaverint, usque ad eum finem, dum posaint seipsa defendere !” Cicero, De Nat. Deor.’Google Scholar

^∗ Kirby and Spence's ‘Entomology’ p. 211.Google Scholar

^† ‘Med. Times and Gazette,’ August 9, 1862.Google Scholar

^‡ Vide also ‘Jour, of Prac. Med. and Surgery,’ Paris, January, 1858, where a case is given of an excited female who endeavoured to throw her child into an oven to bake it. She was cured by drachm doses of sulphuric ether administered per anum.Google Scholar

^∗ Winslow, op. cit.Google Scholar

^∗ Stewart, ‘Philos. of the Human Mind,’ p. 80.Google Scholar

^‡ Prof. Laycock, ‘Mind and Brain,’ vol. ii, pp. 288–9.Google Scholar

^∗ Commissioner Browne, in ‘Repts. Crichton Instit.’ I may here acknowledge the great interest, information, and pleasure which the perusal of these effusions gave me in 1860 (an opportunity for which I am indebted to the kindness of Dr. Lauder Lindsay). Though 1 am very far from thinking that nowadays an asylum report is the proper place for medical disquisitions, of whatever kind, it must be recollected that times were then very different.Google Scholar

^‡ Tincture of Lobelia iuflata, as recommended by Dr. Baudelocque, is a useful sedative in such cases.Google Scholar

^∗ ‘Jour, of Ment. Science,’ July, 1862.Google Scholar

^∗ Dr. Laycock, ‘Nerv. Dis. on Women,’ p. 353.Google Scholar

^∑ Id., op. cit., p. 254.Google Scholar