Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:58:34.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Hereditary Insanity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Hugh Grainger Stewart
Hugh Grainger Stewart*
Affiliation:
Medical Assistant in the Crichton Royal Institution, Dumfries
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The hereditary transmission of disease, or of a tendency to it, has of late attracted more attention than it formerly did, and medical literature has been enriched by many able and learned disquisitions on the subject. Its importance seems to be generally appreciated, to a certain extent, but not to so great an extent, as a more perfect knowledge of its operation, and the vastness of its influence, would justify. From Burton's ’Anatomy of Melancholy’ may be quoted many passages by ancient writers, showing a lively appreciation of the fact of hereditary transmission, especially of disease. Fernelius says, “Such as the temperature of the father is, such is the son's, and, look, what disease the father had when he begot him, his son will have after him, and is as well the inheritor of his infirmities as of his lands.” “And where the complexion and constitution of the father is corrupt, then,” saith Roger Bacon, “the complexion and constitution of the son must needs be corrupt, and so the corruption is derived from the father to the son.” Burton also quotes passages from Hippocrates, Buxtorfius, Lemnius, Paracelsus, Crato, Bruno Seidelius, Daniel Sennertus, Forestus, Rodericus a Fonseca, Lodovicus Mercatus, and many others, referring to hereditary transmission, or the transmission of melancholy. The last mentioned wrote a book on the subject, ‘De Morbis Hereditariis,’ and therein first notices what is now called atavism. “It skips, in some families, the father and goes to the son, or takes every other, and sometimes every third, in a lineal descent, and doth not always produce the same, but some like, and a symbolising disease.” This last remark is of importance, as anticipating a fundamental principle in modern investigations into the subject. Burton himself highly estimates the importance and power of hereditary transmission, when he says, “These secondary causes, hence derived, are commonly so powerful that (as Wolphius holds) they do often alter the primary causes and decrees of the heavens.” This most learned and far-seeing author mentions facts, and hints at conclusions which are only now being understood and arrived at, and shows that an appreciation of the truth of hereditary transmission had formed the basis of laws forbidding the marriage between persons in any whit allied, and of those stern and implacable decrees, which, among certain Indian tribes, and even in Scotland, at an early period, necessitated the destruction of those that suffered from madness, gout, falling sickness, or any such dangerous diseases.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 10 , Issue 49 , April 1864 , pp. 50 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1864 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Burton, , ‘Anatomy of Melancholy,’ vol. i, p. 89.Google Scholar

2 Mentioned by Burton, by J. H. Steinau, in his ‘Essay on Hereditary Diseases,’ p. 2, and by Whitehead on ‘Hereditary Disease’ p. 15.Google Scholar

3 Whitehead, id. lib., p. 15.Google Scholar

4 Burton, , vol. i, p. 89.Google Scholar

1 Burton, , pp. 92, 93. Burton's authority, that such laws existed in Scotland, is Boethius, a somewhat credulous historian. 3 ‘Des Maladies Mentales.’Google Scholar

2 ‘Des Maladies Mentales.’Google Scholar

3 ‘L'Alienation Mentale.’Google Scholar

4 ‘Statistics of Insanity.’Google Scholar

5 Quoted in Sir Alex. Morrison's ‘Lectures on Insanity.’Google Scholar

6 Quoted in Tuke and Bucknill, ‘Psychological Medicine.’Google Scholar

7 Hood, , ‘Statistics of Insanity,’ 1862.Google Scholar

8 Whitehead, , on ‘Hereditary Disease.’Google Scholar

9 ‘Journal of Psychological Medicine,’ 1848.Google Scholar

10 ‘Essay on Hereditary Diseases,’ 1848.Google Scholar

11 “On Hereditary Tendency,” in the ‘Journal of Mental Science’ for January, 1863, and January, 1864.Google Scholar

12 Moreau (de Tours), , ‘La Psychologie Morbide.‘Google Scholar

13 Crichton, , on ‘Mental Derangement.’Google Scholar

14 Burrow's, ‘Commentaries on Insanity.’Google Scholar

15 Combe, , on ‘Mental Derangement.’Google Scholar

16 Op. cit.Google Scholar

17 Mareé, , ‘Des Maladies Mentales.’Google Scholar

18 Moreau, , op. cit. Google Scholar

19 Tuke, and Bucknill, , op. cit. Google Scholar

20 Morel, , ‘Des Maladies Mentales.’Google Scholar

1 Guislain, , quoted by Morel, op. cit., p. 115.Google Scholar

2 Esquirol, , op. cit., vol. i, pp. 62–64, and vol. ii, p. 682.Google Scholar

3 Quoted by Tuke and Bucknill, op. cit., pp. 241–242.Google Scholar

4 Guislain, , ‘Traité sur les Phrenopathies,’ pp. 5–6.Google Scholar

5 Guislain, , ‘l'Aliénation Mentale,’ vol. i, p. 154.Google Scholar

6 Thumam's, ‘Tables and Statistics of the Retreat,’ p. 77.Google Scholar

1 Burrows, , op. cit., p. 104.Google Scholar

2 Noble, , ‘Elements of Psychological Medicine,’ p. 226.Google Scholar

3 Hood, , ‘Statistics of Insanity’ pp. 53, et seq.Google Scholar

4 Morel, , op. cit., p. 114.Google Scholar

5 Mareé, , op. cit., p. 109.Google Scholar

6 Howe, , ‘On Idiocy’ p. 57.Google Scholar

7 Moreau, , op. cit., p. 116.Google Scholar

8 Ellis, , on ‘Insanity’ p. 42.Google Scholar

9 Moreau, , op. cit., p. 116.Google Scholar

10 Ibid., p. 150.Google Scholar

1 Moreau, , op. cit., p. 155.Google Scholar

1 Esquirol, , op. cit., vol. i, pp. 65–67.Google Scholar

2 Thurman, , op. cit. table 14.Google Scholar

3 Take, and Bucknill, , op cit., p. 243.Google Scholar

4 Quoted by Morrison, in op. cit., p. 295.Google Scholar

1 Quoted by Tuke, op. cit., 243.Google Scholar

2 Burrowe, , op. cit., 106.Google Scholar

3 Moreau, , op. cit., p. 141.Google Scholar

1 Hood, , op. cit., p. 51, et seq.Google Scholar

2 Guislian, , ‘Les Phrenopathies.’ pp. 5 and 6.Google Scholar

3 Thurnam, , op. cit., Table XIV. The 71 cases before alluded to, are not here included.Google Scholar

4 Mareé, , op. cit., p. 109.Google Scholar

5 Esquirol, , op. cit., vol. i, pp. 62–64, et vol. ii, p. 144.Google Scholar

6 Prichard, on ‘Insanity,’ p. 161.Google Scholar

7 Whitehead, , op. cit., p. 42.Google Scholar

8 Mareé, , op. cit., p. 109.Google Scholar

1 Mareé, , op. cit., p. 108, Moreau quoted.Google Scholar

2 Haslam, , on ‘Madness,’ p. 230.Google Scholar

3 Combe, , op. cit., p. 92.Google Scholar

4 Moreau, , op. cit., pp. 111,112.Google Scholar

5 Morel, , op. cit., p. 116.Google Scholar

6 Mareé, , op. cit., p. 106.Google Scholar

1 Esquirol, , op. cit., vol. ii, p. 144.Google Scholar

2 Moreau, , p. 114.Google Scholar

3 Morel, , op. cit., p. 258, et seq.Google Scholar

1 Ancel, , on ‘Tuberculosis,’ p. 379.Google Scholar

2 Esquirol, , op. cit., p. 65, et seq.Google Scholar

3 Burrows, , op. cit., p. 104. Morrison, op. cit., p. 296. Pagan, ‘Med. Juris, of Insanity,’ p. 35. Combe, op. cit., p. 94.Google Scholar

4 Moreau, , op. cit., p. 114.Google Scholar

5 Cricliton, , op. cit., vol. ii, p. 229.Google Scholar

6 For January, 1864.Google Scholar

7 Crichton, , op. cit., vol. ii, p. 855.Google Scholar

8 Thurnam, , op. cit., p. 71.Google Scholar

1 Thurnam, , op. cit., Table XII.Google Scholar

2 Hood, , op. cit., p. 77.Google Scholar

1 Thurnam, , op. cit., Table VIII.Google Scholar

2 Hood, , op. cit., p. 27.Google Scholar

1 Op. cit., pp. 53–55.Google Scholar

2 Op. cit., Table XXIX. Members of the Society of Friends are believed to live longer than other people.Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.