Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:15:08.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Note on Questionnaire Rigidity and Extreme Response Set

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. C. Brengelmann
J. C. Brengelmann*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This brief report draws attention to some recent results showing that questionnaire measures of rigidity and extreme response set, which are regarded as closely related variables, are likely to possess a much higher degree of generality than usually accepted and that they play an important part in the measurement of normal and abnormal personality.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 106 , Issue 442 , January 1960 , pp. 187 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Barnes, E. H., “The relationship of biased test responses to psychopathology”, J. abn. soc. Psychol, 1955, 51, 286–290.Google Scholar
2. Brenoelmann, J. C., “Extraversion, neurotische Tendenz und Rigidität im Umkehrversuch (Prismenbrille)”, Z. exp. and angew. Psychol., 1957, 4, 339–362.Google Scholar
3. Idem , “Effects of exposure time on immediate recall of neurotics and schizophrenics”, J. Ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 665–680.Google Scholar
4. Idem , “Abnormal and personality correlates of certainty”, J. ment. Sci., 1959, 105, 142–162.Google Scholar
5. Idem , “Expressive movements and abnormal behaviour”, in Experimental Abnormal Psychology (ed. Eysenck, H. J.), 1960. London: Pitman Medical Publ. Co. (toappear).Google Scholar
6. Idem , “Extreme response set, drive level and abnormality in questionnaire rigidity”, J. Ment. Sci., 1960, 106, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Idem, Hahn, H., Pedley, J. C., and Amato, J. G., “Learning and personality: I. A pilot experiment.” (Submitted to: Acta Psychol.)Google Scholar
8. Eysenck, H. J., “Probleme der diagnostischen Untersuchung und Demonstration des Charakter-Interpretationstestes”, Z. exp. and angew. Psychol., 1954, 2, 1–32.Google Scholar
9. Idem , “The questionnaire measurement of extraversion and neuroticism”, Riv. psychol., 1956, 50, 113–140.Google Scholar
10. Jenkins, J. J., and Lykken, D. T., “Individual differences”, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 1957, 8, 79–112.Google Scholar
11. McClelland, D. C., “Personality”, Ann. Rev. Psychol., 1956, 7, 39–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Nigniewitzky, R. D., A statistical study of rigidity as a personality variable.” M.A. Thesis, 1955. University of London.Google Scholar
13. Idem , A statistical and experimental investigation of rigidity in relation to personality and social attitudes Ph.D.Thesis, 1956. University of London.Google Scholar
14. Soueif, M. I., “Extreme response sets as a measure of intolerance of ambiguity”, Brit. J. Psychol., 1958, 49, 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.