Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:04:23.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Monasterio Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Extract

Although it is certainly no part of our duty to discuss the charges brought against lunacy doctors abroad, while, indeed, we think that as a general rule it is in much better taste to mind our own business, there is the legitimate motive which the discussion of such charges permits, of endeavouring to learn the lesson taught by the failure, if such it be, of laws enacted for the custody of the insane, and thereby seeking to ascertain whether there is any corresponding defect or source of danger in the legislative enactments of our own country. It also behoves the critic of foreign institutions, or of the scandals alleged to occur in other countries, to remember that he may easily fall into the error of forming an erroneous opinion or a harsh judgment from an insufficient acquaintance with all the circumstances of the case.

Type
Part II.—Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1883 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* For details see “Projet de loi portant revision de la loi du 30 Juin, 1838, sur les aliénés, présenté au nom de M. Jules Grévy, Président de la République Francaise. Par M. A. Faillières, Ministre de l'Intérieur et, des Cultes, Paris, 1882. Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.