Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:44:35.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laboratory Aids to Diagnosis in Mental Diseases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

P. K. McCowan
P. K. McCowan*
Affiliation:
West Park Mental Hospital, Epsom
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For some time past there has been an increasing use of laboratory methods in the diagnosis of mental disorders. The following aims at offering further proof of the undoubted value of this method of approach in such cases. There seems, however, to be a growing tendency, not devoid of danger, to ascribe diagnostic specificity to one or other of the many tests in use for such examinations. Although it is undoubtedly true that an exhaustive analysis of a spinal fluid may in many cases lead to a correct diagnosis of the clinical condition of the patient from whom the specimen has been taken, it only requires a study of the literature to show that none of the reactions or group of reactions obtained from the spinal fluid can be regarded as pathognomonic of any disease of the central nervous system.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 71 , Issue 293 , April 1925 , pp. 192 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1925 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Candler, and Mann, . —Arch. of Neur. and Psychiat., vi, 1914.Google Scholar
2 McDonagh, . —The Biology and Treatment of Venereal Diseases, London, 1915.Google Scholar
3 Simons, Jones and Goddard, . — “The Margin of Error in the Wassermann Test (a Study of 1,000 Cases made Independently by Two Laboratories),” Interst. Med. Journ., St. Louis, 1916, xxiii, p. 654.Google Scholar
4 Moore, . —Arch. Internal Med., 1920, xxv, p. 58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Thompson, . —Amer. Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1921, v, p. 135.Google Scholar
6 Mellanby, and Davies, Amyl. —Brit. Journ. Exper. Path., iv, p. 132.Google Scholar
7 Chauffard, and Boidin, . — “Un an de ponctions lombaires dans un service hospitalier,” Gaz. de Hô., 1904, lxxvii, p. 725.Google Scholar
8 Boyd, . —The Cerebro-spinal Fluid, p. 39.Google Scholar
9 Fildes, Parnall and Maitland, . — “Unsuspected Involvement of the Central Nervous System in Syphilis,” Med. Research Comm., Special Report Series, No. 45, 1920.Google Scholar
10 Fildes, P.— “The Prevalence of Syphilis among Apparently Healthy Adult Inhabitants of the East End of London,” Royal Comm. on Venereal Diseases, Final Report, 1916, App. xii, p. 139.Google Scholar
11 Thaysen, Hess Dr. — “Latent Syphilis in a Medical Department,” Lancet, January 29, 1921, p. 213.Google Scholar
12 Mattauschek, and Pilcz, . — “Ueber die Weiteren Schicksale 4134 katamnestisch verfolgter Fälle luetischer Infektion,” Med. Klinik, Wien, September 21, 1913.Google Scholar
13 Power, and Murphy, . —System of Syphilis.Google Scholar
14 Carlill, H.—Hunterian Lecture on “The Diagnosis and Treatment of Syphilis of the Central Nervous System.” Google Scholar
15 Orr, and Rows, . — “Lesions of the Spinal Cord the Result of Absorption from Localized Septic Foci,” Rev. of Neur. and Psychiat., January, 1906.Google Scholar
16 “Alcoholic Meningitis,” Lancet, February 14, 1920.Google Scholar
17 Nonne, . —Neur. Cbl., 1912, p. 5.Google Scholar
18 Sicard, and Galezowski, . —Rev. Neur., 1914, p. 300.Google Scholar
19 O'Farrell, and Balfour, . — “Granule Shedding in Treponema Pallidum and Associated Spirochætæ,” Journ. of the R.A.M.C., September, 1911.Google Scholar
20 Ballet, and Blocq, Paul. —Traité de Medicine.Google Scholar
21 Forster, and Tomaszewski, . —“Untersuchungen des Paralytikergehirns,” Deutsche med. Wochenschr., April 2, 1914.Google Scholar
22 Warthin, A. S.—Amer. Journ. Med. Sc., 1916, clii.Google Scholar
23 Hirschmann, Heinrich Dr. —Med. Klinik, October 9, 1921.Google Scholar
24 McDonagh, . — “The Wassermann Reaction in Congenital Syphilis,” Lancet, October 8, 1921.Google Scholar
25 Idem. — “The Rationale of the Wassermann Reaction,” Lancet, December 24, 1921.Google Scholar
26 Mott, F. W. Sir— “Histological Observations on the Changes in the Nervous System in Trypanosome Infections,” Arch. of Neur., iii.Google Scholar
27 Manson-Bahr, . —Tropical Diseases, 7th ed., 1921.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.