Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-hxdxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-14T08:47:57.660Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Guiteau

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 28 , Issue 124 , January 1883 , pp. 577 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1883 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* The post-mortem examination will be found under “Notes and News.” One would have thought that if ever an autopsy should have been conducted in a way to leave no reasonable ground for complaint, it would have been that of this unfortunate man. Yet “lack of facilities” was allowed to stand in the way of a complete examination, and the vessels in the thorax were divided before the head was examined. Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.