Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:29:56.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further Aspects of Brief Retrograde Amnesia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

G. de M. Rudolf*
Affiliation:
R.A.M.C.; Mount Pleasant, Clevedon; Bristol Clinic for Functional Disorders

Extract

Knowledge of amnesia is dependent upon the subject's statement. He can tell us what he will. If he has studied the subject well, he can mislead us. He may have motives for fabricating. He may benefit, he thinks, financially, socially or in other material ways, by inventing an amnesia. A history of grave injury may produce avoidance of danger or of unpleasant work. A medical history, which the patient may think unusual, may give him prestige or sympathy. Finally, he may invent an amnesia to give the doctor a good story or to “pull his leg.”

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1948 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Donald, K. W. (1947), Brit. Med. J., 1, 712.Google Scholar
Guttmann, E. (1946), J. Ment. Sci., 92, 1.Google Scholar
Matthews, B. H. C. (1945), Brit. Med. J., 2, 114.Google Scholar
Rudolf, G. de M. (1947), J. Ment. Sci., 93, 342.Google Scholar
Russell, W. R., and Nathan, P. W. (1946), Brain, 69, 280.Google Scholar
Sargant, W., and Slater, E. (1941), Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 34, 757.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.