Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:48:23.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Functional Disorganization of the Left Limbs in a Tumour of the Corpus Callosum Infiltrating the Hemispheres

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

R. Klein  and
I. M. Ingram
R. Klein
Affiliation:
Crichton Royal, Dumfries
I. M. Ingram
Affiliation:
Crichton Royal, Dumfries
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Tumours of the corpus callosum (C.c.) are known to be a difficult diagnostic problem. Intellectual and mental disturbances and rapid deterioration in the course of the illness have been observed in most of these cases and are considered by many authors to indicate an involvement of this body (Lévy-Valensi, 1910; Mingazzini, 1922; Ironside and Guttmacher, 1929; Alpers and Grant, 1931; Voris and Adson, 1935; Schlesinger, 1951, Bremer et al., 1956). However, a similar picture may also occur in tumours of other sites; moreover, tumours of the C.c. tend to infiltrate the hemispheres, particularly the cingulum and the frontal lobes, and this might well account for the mental picture. A sign which seems to be more specific for damage of the C.c. is dyspraxia restricted to the left limbs in right-handed persons. Although this dyspraxia has been reported only in a small minority of cases concerned, it has not been observed in lesions other than those of the C.c.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 104 , Issue 436 , July 1958 , pp. 732 - 742
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1958 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature

Akeleitis, A. J., Riskeen, W. A., and Wagenen, W. P. von, Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 1942, 47, 97.Google Scholar
Alpers, B. J., and Grant, F. C., ibid., 1931, 25, 67.Google Scholar
Armitage, G., and Meagher, —., Z. Neur. Psychiat., 1933, 146, 454.Google Scholar
Bremer, F., Brihaye, J., and André-Balisaux, G., Schw. Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 1956, 78, 31.Google Scholar
Conrad, K., Z. Neur. Psychiat., 1933, 147, 346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Critchley, M., The Parietal Lobes, 1953. London: E. Arnold & Co.Google Scholar
Idem, Brain, 1930, 53, 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenwald, H., Nervenarzt, 1931, 4, 681.Google Scholar
Foix, Ch., and Hillemand, P., L'Encéphale, 1925, 20, 90.Google Scholar
Frantz, K., J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1950, 112, 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldstein, K., J. f. Psychol. Neur., 1908, 11, 270.Google Scholar
Idem, Neurol. Zbl., 1909, 28, 898.Google Scholar
Hartmann, F., Mon. Psych. Neur., 1907, 21, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hécaen, H., and Ajuriaguerra, J. de, Méconnaissances et Hallucinations Corporelles, 1952. Paris: Masson & Cie.Google Scholar
Hursch, J. B., Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 1945, 53, 274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ironside, R., and Guttmacher, M., Brain, 1929, 52, 422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, E. R., and Nielsen, J. M., Bull. Los Angeles Neur. Soc., 1937, 2, 1020.Google Scholar
Klein, R., Mschr. Psychiat. Neur., 1926, 61, 216.Google Scholar
Idem and Mallie, P. P., J. Ment. Sci., 1945, 91, 518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévy-Valensi, J., Le Corps Calleux, 1910. Paris.Google Scholar
Liepmann, H., Das Krankheitsbild der Apraxie (Motorische Asymbolie), 1900. Berlin: S. Karger.Google Scholar
Idem and Maas, O., J. f. Psychol. Neur., 1908, 10, 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mingazzini, G., Der Balken, 1922. Berlin: Julius Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pötzl, O., Z. Neur. Psychiat., 1924, 93, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, B., Neurology, 1951, 1, 419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K. U., J. Comp. Psych. and Psychol., 1952, 45, 66.Google Scholar
Sweet, W. H., Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 1941, 45, 86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vleuten, C. F., Z. Psychiat., 1907, 64, 203.Google Scholar
Voris, H. C., and Adson, A. W., Arch. Neur. Psychiat., 1935, 34, 965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.