Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:02:53.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Factorial Study of Physical Constitution in Women

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Linford Rees
Linford Rees*
Affiliation:
Wales and Monmouthshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The assessment of body build as an integral part of the total personality is now accepted as an important procedure in the practice of clinical psychiatry. Body build has been found to influence symptomatology, mental status, course and prognosis in neurotic and psychotic disorders (Betz, 1942; Mauz, 1930; Kisselew, 1931; Freudenberg, 1941; Rees, 1945, 1947). Whereas the delineation of physical types has now become an objective procedure by the use of anthropometric indices (Rees, 1949), it has long been recognized that the differentiation of physical types in women is much more difficult. Kretschmer (1921) pointed out that the types of physique described by him were less easily diagnosed in women, and Sheldon (1940) pays comparatively little attention to the variations of female body build.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 96 , Issue 404 , July 1950 , pp. 619 - 632
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1950 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aschner, B. (1924), Die Konstitution der Frau und ihre Beziehung zur Geburtshilfe und Gynäcologie. München.Google Scholar
Bakwen, H. R., and Bakwen, R. M. (1934), Am. J. Dis. Child., 48, 1030.Google Scholar
Bayley, N., and Davies, F. C. (1935), Biometrika, 27, 26.Google Scholar
Beneke, F. W. (1878), Die Anatomischem Grundlagen der Konstitutionsanomalien des Menschen. Google Scholar
Betz, B. J. (1942), Hum. Biol., 14, 192.Google Scholar
Brugsch, T. (1931), Die Biologie der Personen, 2, 1.Google Scholar
Burt, C. (1938), Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 17, 158.Google Scholar
Burt, C. (1941), Factors of the Mind. London.Google Scholar
Carter, H. D., and Krause, R. H. (1936), Child Develpm., 7, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carus, C. G. (1852), Symbolik der Menschlichen Gestalt (orig. 1852 Ed. 1925 Celle).Google Scholar
Cohen, J. I. (1938), J. Ment. Sci., 84, 495.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. I. (1940), J. Ment. Sci., 86, 602.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. I. (1941), Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 18, 323.Google Scholar
Draper, G. (1925), Human Constitution. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Freudenberg, R. (1941), J. Ment. Sci., 87, 529.Google Scholar
Hammond, W. H. (1942). Man, 42, 4.Google Scholar
Harris, (1948), Child Health and Development, p. 142. Edited by Ellis, R. W. B. London.Google Scholar
Hrdlicka, A. (1939), Practical Anthropometry. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. (1932), Problems of Relative Growth. London.Google Scholar
Kisselew, M. W. (1931), Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 132, 18.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, E. (1921), Körperbau und Charakter. Berlin.Google Scholar
Krogman, W. M. (1940), Child Develpm., 11.Google Scholar
Manoeuvrier, L. (1902), Mém. de la Soc. d'Anthr. de Paris, Sec. 111.Google Scholar
Martin, R. (1928), Lehrbuch der Anthropologie. Jena.Google Scholar
Mauz, F. (1930), Die Prognostik der endogenen Psychosen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
McCloy, C. H. (1940), Child Develpm., 11, 249.Google Scholar
Mullen, F. A. (1940), Child Develpm., 11, 27.Google Scholar
Rees, L., and Eysenck, H. J. (1945), Child Develpm., 91, 89.Google Scholar
Rees, L., and Eysenck, H. J. (1943), Physical Constitution in Relation to Effort Syndrome, Neurotic and Psychotic Types. M.D. Thesis, University of Wales.Google Scholar
Rees, L., and Eysenck, H. J. (1945), J. Ment. Sci., 91, 89.Google Scholar
Rees, L., and Eysenck, H. J. (1947), Eugenics Review, 39, 50.Google Scholar
Rees, L., and Eysenck, H. J. (1949), J. Ment. Sci., 95, 171.Google Scholar
Rostan, L. (1828), Cours Elementaire d'Hygiène. Paris.Google Scholar
Sheldon, W. H. (1940), The Varieties of Human Physique. New York.Google Scholar
Sigaud, C. (1914), La Forme Humaine, Paris.Google Scholar
Stockard, C. R. (1923), The Physical Basis of Personality. New York.Google Scholar
Thompson, G. H. (1939), The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability. London.Google Scholar
Thompson, H. (1946), Manual of Child Psychology, p. 255. Ed. Carmichael. New York.Google Scholar
Viola, G. (1933), La Constituzione Individuale. Bologna.Google Scholar
Wilder, H. H. (1920), Laboratory Manual of Anthropometry. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.