Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:38:05.775Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Studies of the Placebo Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. B. Knowles  and
C. J. Lucas
J. B. Knowles
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychiatry Research Group Graylingwell Hospital, Chichester
C. J. Lucas
Affiliation:
Clinical Psychiatry Research Group Graylingwell Hospital, Chichester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The critical evaluation of new drugs or remedies against inert substances or nonspecific procedures has led to the recognition that responses to a placebo are important in their own right. Such responses may be dramatic and persistent and they can be associated with quite definite physiological changes (Wolf and Pinsky, 1954). The placebo response may well be an important component of many established treatments both physical and psychological, and does in itself constitute a means of therapy (Roberts and Hamilton, 1958; Gliedman et al., 1958).

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 106 , Issue 442 , January 1960 , pp. 231 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Beecher, H. K., J. Amer. Med. Ass., 1955, 159, 1602.Google Scholar
2. Eysenck, H. J., J. Neurol. Psychiat., 1943, 6, 22.Google Scholar
3. Idem, Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1946, 60, 75.Google Scholar
4. Idem, Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
5. Idem, The Dynamics of Anxiety and Hysteria, 1957. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
6. Idem , Maudsley Personality Inventory; 1959. Manual. In press.Google Scholar
7. Idem and Furneaux, W. D., J. Exp. Psychol., 1945, 35, 485.Google Scholar
8. Glaser, E. M., Brit. J. Pharmcol., 1953, 8, 187.Google Scholar
9. Idem and Whittow, G. C., J. Physiol., 1953, 122, 43(p).Google Scholar
10. Guedman, et al., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1958, 79, 345.Google Scholar
11. Guedman, L. H., Gantt, W. H., and Teitelbaum, H. A., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1957, 113, 1103.Google Scholar
12. Hawkings, J. R., and Tibbetts, R. W., J. Ment. Sci., 1956a, 102, 43.Google Scholar
13. Idem , ibid., 1956b, 102, 52.Google Scholar
14. Joyce, C. R. B., Proceedings of the International Meeting in Neuro-Psychopharmacology, 1959. In press.Google Scholar
15. Kurland, A. A., Behav. Sci., 1957, 2, 101.Google Scholar
16. Lasaona, L., et al., Amer. J. Med., 1954, 16, 770.Google Scholar
17. Roberts, J. M., and Hamilton, M., J. Ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 1052.Google Scholar
18. Siegel, S., Non-Parametric Statistics for the Behaviour Sciences, 1956. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
19. Stukart, K. G., Suggestibility: A Factorial and Experimental Analysis, 1958. Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
20. Trouton, D. S., J. Ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 344.Google Scholar
21. Vernon, P. E., Personality Tests and Assessments, 1953. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
22. Wolf, S., and Pinsky, R. H., J. Amer. Med. Ass., 1954, 155, 889.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.