Article contents
Experimental Psychology in Relation to Insanity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2018
Extract
Up to the present time the experimental movement in psychology has been directed chiefly to the study of methods by which mental phenomena may be subjected to exact investigation, and by which they may receive for purposes of comparison some kind of quantitative expression. So far as these methods have been perfected they have been directed mainly to the investigation of general psychological laws, and of the relation of psychological to physiological processes. Comparatively little has been done in the way of application of these methods to elucidate practical questions; little attention has been paid to individual psychology and to the exact nature of the differences which distinguish the various types of normal and abnormal mind. The more theoretical work of experimental psychologists has naturally a great interest for students of insanity, and must affect their conceptions of abnormal mind, but the special question which I intend to consider is of a more direct and practical kind, viz., the possibility of using the methods of experimental psychology to help directly in the study of the problems of insanity.
- Type
- Part I.—Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1895
References
∗ “Journal of Mental Science,” Jan., 1875.Google Scholar
† Bead at the Annual Meeting of the Medico-Psychological Association, Julv, 1895.Google Scholar
∗ “Journal of Mental Science,” Jan., 1875.Google Scholar
† Read at the Annual Meeting of the Medico-Psychological Association, July, 1895.Google Scholar
∗ “Mind,” Vol. xii., p. 79, 1887.Google Scholar
∗ “Psychologische Arbeiten,” Bd. i., Heft i., S. 92, 1895.Google Scholar
† “Ueber die Beinflussing einfacher psychischer Vorgänge durch einige Arznesmittel,” Jena, 1892.Google Scholar
∗ “Archiv. f. Psychiatrie,” xxvi., S. 597.Google Scholar
† “Ueber das Gedächtniss,” Leipzig, 1885.Google Scholar
∗ “Psych. Arbeiten,” Bd. i., S. 152, 1895.Google Scholar
† “Du Bois Ramond's Archiv.,” 1890, S. 89.Google Scholar
∗ “Ueber geistige Arbeit,” Jena, 1894.Google Scholar
† “Trans. 7th Internat. Congress of Hygiene,” London, 1891, Vol. iv., p. 87.Google Scholar
‡ “Zeitsch. f. Psych. u. Phys. d. Sinnesorgane,” Bd. vi., S. 191, 1898.Google Scholar
- 3
- Cited by
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.