Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:09:28.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental Method in Clinical Psychological Practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

R. W. Payne
R. W. Payne*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London, S.E.5
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Perhaps in no other applied discipline are there to be found so many differences of opinion as exist in clinical psychology today. Clinical psychologists in fact even disagree about the fundamental approach to their own subject. Let us examine briefly what appear to be the major approaches.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 103 , Issue 430 , January 1957 , pp. 189 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1957 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bartlet, D., and Shapiro, M. B., “Investigation and treatment of a reading disability in a dull child with severe psychiatric disturbances.” (To appear in Brit. J. Educ. Psychol.)Google Scholar
2. Eysenck, H. J., “The role of the psychologist in psychiatric practice.” (An address to the Section of Psychiatry of the Royal Society of Medicine, 12 February, 1952. Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1952.)Google Scholar
3. Payne, R. W., “The role of the clinical psychologist at the Institute of Psychiatry”, Revue de Psychologie Appliquée, 1953, 3, 150–160.Google Scholar
4. Shapiro, M. B., “An experimental approach to diagnostic psychological testing”, J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 748–764.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.