Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:35:07.437Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Prefrontal Leucotomy Upon Visual Imagery and the Ability to Perform Complex Operations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

C. G. Costello
C. G. Costello*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, St. George's Hospital, Morpeth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Two observations made on the post-leucotomy patient inspired the investigation to be reported in this paper. They are, first, that the post-leucotomy patient seems unable to deal with two things at once. Both Ackerly (1935) and Brickner (1939) have referred to this deficit. The second observation was that there was apparently lesser vitality of imagery after operation. A photographer in Pippard's study (1955) who had had, as he said, a “photographic memory”, could no longer connect people's faces with photographs of them he had taken in the past. A 35 year old schoolteacher in the same study completely lost her visual imagery after operation, and Brain (1954) has reported a similar deficit in two cases. Zangwill and Humphrey's report (1951) of cessation of dreaming in some patients after brain injury is possibly related to this deficit. Petrie (1952) found an increase in reversals, especially willed reversals on the Necker Cube after operation, and Gordon (1950) has presented findings showing that the control of fluctuation was significantly related to less vivid and controlled imagery.

The investigation reported here was designed to examine further these two post-leucotomy deficits, and to see if they were related in any way.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 102 , Issue 428 , July 1956 , pp. 507 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerly, S., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1935, 12, 6.Google Scholar
Brain, W. R., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1951, 44, 37.Google Scholar
Idem , ibid., 1954, 47, 288.Google Scholar
Brickner, R., Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1939, 41, 580.Google Scholar
El Koussy, A. H., Proc. XII Inter. Congress of Psychol., 1950. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, Ltd.Google Scholar
Freeman, W., and Watts, J. W., Psychosurgery, 1942. Springfield, Ill.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. A., Brit. J. Psychol., 1950, 41, 63.Google Scholar
Petrie, A., Personality and the Frontal Lobes, 1952. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pippard, J., J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 774.Google Scholar
Rylander, G., Personality Changes after Operations on the Frontal Lobes, 1939. Oxford Univ. Press Google Scholar
Zangwill, O. L., and Humphrey, M. E., J. Neurol. Neuros. and Psychiat., 1951, 14, 322.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.