Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T19:14:21.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Meprobamate on Time Perception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

C. G. Costello
C. G. Costello*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry (Maudsley Hospital), University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The change in time perception produced by the administration of drugs has received a fair amount of attention. Frankenhaeuser (6) has reviewed the work on the effects of hashish and mescaline intoxication on the estimation of time. She concludes that “there seems to be some agreement in that time seems longer than usual in passing but shorter when regarded in retrospect”. But this work dealt with introspective reports regarding the passage of time rather than with quantitative changes and will not be discussed further here.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 107 , Issue 446 , January 1961 , pp. 67 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1961 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Clauser, G., Die Kopfuhr. Das automatisches Erwachen. Stuttgart: Enke, 1954.Google Scholar
2. Costello, C. G. The effects of a depressant drug on certain perceptual tests. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London, 1960.Google Scholar
3. Eysenck, H. J., “Cortical inhibition, figural after-effect and theory of personality”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Eysenck, H. J., The Maudsley Personality Inventory. University of London Press, 1959.Google Scholar
5. Eysenck, H. J., “Personality and the estimation of time”, Percept. Mot. Skills, 1959, 9, 405–406.Google Scholar
6. Frankenhaeuser, M., Estimation of Time. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1959.Google Scholar
7. Goldstone, S., Boardman, W. K., and Lhamon, W. T., “Effect of quinalbarbitone, dextro-amphetamine, and placebo on apparent time”, Brit. J. Psychol., 1958, 49, 324–328.Google Scholar
8. Hormia, A., “On the sensation of duration, especially regarding the relations between the intensity and duration of sensation”, Annal. Acad. Sci., Fennicae V. Medica-Anthropol, 1956, 58.Google Scholar
9. Llewellyn-Thomas, E., “Successive time estimation during automatic positive feed-back'”,. Percept. Mot. Skills, 1959, 9, 219–224.Google Scholar
10. Siegel, S., Nonparametric statistics for the behavioural sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.Google Scholar
11. Steinberg, H., “Changes in time perception induced by an anaesthetic drug”, Brit. J. Psychol., 1955, 46, 273–279.Google Scholar
12. Sterzinger, O., “Chemopsychologische Untersuchungen über den Zeitsinn”, Z. Psychol. Physiol. Sinnesorg., 1935, 134, 100–131.Google Scholar
13. Sterzinger, O., “Neue chemopsychologische Untersuchungen über den menschlichen Zeitsinn”, Z. Psychol. Physiol. Sinnesorg., 1938, 143, 391–406.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.