Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:39:25.582Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effects of Meprobamate on the Performance of a Five-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

G. S. Claridge
G. S. Claridge*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry (Maudsley Hospital), University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The theoretical framework developed by Eysenck (1955) to account for individual differences in motor and other types of performance has, as its main postulate, the statement that extraverts are characterized by high rates and introverts by low rates of inhibitory growth. An extension of this framework (1957) has allowed a link to be made between personality theory and the theory of drug action, since it has been proposed that depressant drugs increase cortical inhibition and so produce extraverted behaviour patterns, while the opposite is true of stimulant drugs. A test of this postulate by Eysenck, Casey and Trouton (1957) suggested that it was essentially confirmed when applied to motor performance. Dextro-amphetamine sulphate was found to improve and sodium amylobarbitone to depress pursuit rotor performance at all stages of practice. It was concluded that the effect of sodium amylobarbitone was to increase the two inhibitory factors recognized by Hullian learning theory, viz. conditioned inhibition (SIR) and reactive inhibition (IR).

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 107 , Issue 448 , May 1961 , pp. 590 - 602
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1961 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ammons, R. B., “Acquisition of motor skill. II. Rotary pursuit performance with continuous practice before and after a single rest”, J. exp. Psychol, 1947, 37, 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bills, A. G., “Blocking: a new principle of mental fatigue”, Amer. J. Psychol, 1931, 43, 230–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, D. E., Perception and communication, (1958). London: Pergamon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claridge, G. S., in Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), Experiments in personality, 1960. London: Routledge ' Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem , “Arousal and inhibition as determinants of the performance of neurotics”, Brit. J. Psychol, 1961 (in press).Google Scholar
Idem, and Herrington, R. N., “Sedation threshold, personality, and the theory of neurosis”, J. Ment. Sci., 1960 (in press).Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., “A dynamic theory of anxiety and hysteria”, J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 28–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , “Drugs and personality: I. Theory and methodology”, J. Ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 119–31.Google Scholar
Idem, Manual, The Maudsley Personality Inventory. 1959. London: University of London Press.Google Scholar
Idem , Casey, S., and Trouton, D. S., “Drugs and personality: II. The effect of stimulant and depressant drugs on continuous work”, J. Ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 645–49.Google Scholar
Farber, I. E., and Spence, K. W., “Complex learning and conditioning as a function of anxiety”, J. exp. Psychol, 1953, 45, 120–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebb, D. O., “Drives and the CNS (Concepual Nervous System)”, Psychol Rev., 1955, 62, 243–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimble, G. A., “An experimental test of a two-factor theory of inhibition”, J. exp. Psychol, 1949, 39, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem, and Shatel, R. B., “The relationship between two kinds of inhibition and the amount of practice”, J. exp. Psychol, 1952, 44, 355–59.Google Scholar
Knowles, J. B., and Lucas, C. J., “Experimental studies of the placebo response”, J. Ment. Sci., 1960, 106, 231–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, J. A., “Advance information in sensori-motor skills”, Quart. J. exp. Psychol, 1953, 5, 141–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, J. A., and Spence, K. W., “The relationship of anxiety level to performance in serial learning”, J. exp. Psychol, 1952, 44, 61–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treadwell, E., in Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), Experiments in Personality, 1960. London: Routledge ' Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Trouton, D. S., “Placebos and their psychological effects”, J. ment. Sci., 1957, 103, 344–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venables, P. H., “Factors in the motor behaviour of functional psychotics”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol, 1959, 58, 153–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.