Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:14:55.773Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Electrical Stimulation of the Brain on the Perception of Pain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Phyllis G. Croft
Phyllis G. Croft*
Affiliation:
Universities' Federation for Animal Welfare. From Neuropsychiatric Research Centre, Whitchurch Hospital; Cardiff
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The fact that electrical stimulation of the brain can produce unconsciousness in man and animals has been known since the eighteenth century, and from time to time this knowledge has been used in the production of anaesthesia for surgical purposes; Hobday, in 1932, performed castrations and herniotomies in small animals under electrical general anaesthesia, and in 1935 Hertz used electrical anaesthesia for laparotomies in dogs. To-day electrical stunning is used in bacon factories with the object of rendering pigs unconscious before slaughter. Electroconvulsant therapy (E.C.T.) is widely used in mental hospitals for the treatment of certain conditions, and recently Freeman (1948) has modified this technique to produce surgical anaesthesia for prefrontal leucotomy.

In some instances electrical anaesthesia has proved satisfactory, but there have been reports of “distorted consciousness” after E.C.T. in human subjects (Morgan, 1950), and of electrical curarization after industrial accidents (Hume, 1935); in these conditions the subject is conscious of sensation but unable to make voluntary movements. Such a condition is only appreciated when the subject is questioned after regaining full consciousness, and hence, if it occurred in animals, it would not be readily recognized.

The object of the work described in this paper was to determine the effect of the many variables of electric stimulation, and to investigate the state of consciousness of human subjects and animals after electric stunning. It was hoped thus to provide a basis for future work on electrical anacsthesia and to acquire a better understanding of the action of E.C.T.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 98 , Issue 412 , July 1952 , pp. 421 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1952 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arieff, A. J., 1949, Arch. Neurol Psychiat, 62, 680.Google Scholar
Bernstein, L., J. Physiol., 1950, 111, 33.Google Scholar
Boshes, L. D., Darrow, C. W., Solomon, A. P., and Pathman, J. H., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1943, 50, 108.Google Scholar
Clark, G. A., and Wall, T. F., Quart. J. exp. Physiol., 1934, 24, 85.Google Scholar
Croft, P. G., 1952, in Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, V. D., and Davenport, H. W., J. Nutrii., 1948, 36, i, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, E. W., and Morison, R. S., Am. J. Physiol., 1942, 135, 280.Google Scholar
Freeman, W., Lancet, 1948, 255, 371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaultierotti, T., Martini, E., and Marzorati, A., J. Neurophysiol., 1949, 12, 363.Google Scholar
Harreveld, A. van, Plesset, M. S., and Wiersma, C. A. G., Am. J. Physiol., 1943. 137, 39.Google Scholar
Holzbauer, M., Rigler, R., and Rosenkranz, W., Nature, Lond., 1952, 159, 190.Google Scholar
Hume, C. W., Nature, Lond., 1935, 135, 105.Google Scholar
Hunter, J. H., and Jasper, H. H., E.E.G. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1949, 1, iii, 315.Google Scholar
Ivy, A. C., and Barry, F. S., Am. J. Physiol., 1932, 99, 298.Google Scholar
Klein, R., and Early, D. T., J. Ment. Sci., 1949, 95, 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Longley, E. O., ibid., 1949, 95, 51.Google Scholar
Idem, Brit. Vet. J., 1950, 106, 250.Google Scholar
Morgan, C. J., J. Physiol., 1950, 112, 48.Google Scholar
Pierce, J. F., Russell, R. W., and Patton, R. A., J. Psychol., 1950, 30, 157.Google Scholar
Roth, M., Brit. Med. J., 1951, ii, 415.Google Scholar
Russell, R. W., J. Personality, 1948, 17, 16.Google Scholar
Stone, C. P., Eady, H. R., and Hauty, G. T., J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol., 1949, 42, 427.Google Scholar
Toman, J. E. P., and Goodman, L. S., Res. Pub. nerv. ment. Dis., 1947, 26, 143.Google Scholar
Walter, , Grey, W., Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1951, 44, 315.Google Scholar
Williams, D., Brit. Med. J., 1950, i, 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.