Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:16:28.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disorders of Temporal Judgment Associated with Amnesic States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Moyra Williams  and
O. L. Zangwill
Moyra Williams
Affiliation:
The Psychological Department, Graylingwell Hospital, Chichester
O. L. Zangwill
Affiliation:
Institute of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is widely recognized that judgment of time may be grossly disturbed in amnesic states of organic origin. Korsakoff (1890), in his classic exposition of the syndrome which has come to bear his name, pointed out that memory for time is often more severely affected than memory for events, and that temporal reference may remain markedly defective, even after remission of the psychosis. Thus one of his patients was able to recall recent events with fair accuracy, but was unable to state whether a given event had occurred yesterday or three years before. After recovery, moreover, this patient presented disturbances in the temporal sphere as the most outspoken residual symptom. Korsakoff further observed that defects of temporal localization might appear as the most prominent manifestation in mild cases of the amnesic syndrome. It would seem, then, that disorders of time judgment form an integral part of this syndrome and may well reflect a disturbance of memory at its highest levels of psychological organization.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 96 , Issue 403 , April 1950 , pp. 484 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1950 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartlett, F. C. (1932), Remembering. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bonhoeffer, K. (1901), Die akuten Geisteskrankheiten der Gewohnheitstrinker. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Coriat, I. (1904), J. nerv. ment. Dis., 31, 577.Google Scholar
Delay, J. (1942), Les Dissolutions de la Mémoire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R. D. (1937), Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 37, 748.Google Scholar
Janet, P. (1928), L'Evolution de la Mémoire et de la Notion du Temps. Paris: Chahine.Google Scholar
Kleist, K. (1934), Gehirnpathologie. Google Scholar
Korsakoff, S. S. (1890), Arch. f. Psychiat., 21, 669.Google Scholar
Lange, J. (1936), “Agnosien und Apraxien,” in Bumke, O., and Foerster, O., Handb. d. Neurol., 6, 807.Google Scholar
Lidz, T. (1942), Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 47, 588.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., and Guttmann, E. (1936), J. Ment. Sci., 82, 222.Google Scholar
Meggendorfer, E. (1928), “Intoxikationspsychosen,” in Bumke, O., Handb. d. Geisteskr., 7, 3. 272.Google Scholar
Paterson, A., and Zangwill, O. L. (1945), Brain., 68, 188.Google Scholar
Russell, W. Ritchie, (1947), Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1, 1.Google Scholar
Russell, W. Ritchie, (1948), Edin. med. J., 55, 92.Google Scholar
Schilder, P. (1942), Mind: Perception and Thought in their Constructive Aspects. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Van der Horst, L. (1932). Monatschr. Psychiat. Neurol. 83, 65.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.