Hostname: page-component-669899f699-swprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T05:20:32.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Differential Effect of Cortisone and of A.C.T.H. On Mood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. J. Fleminger
J. J. Fleminger*
Affiliation:
Senior Registrar Maudsley Hospital, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is evident from many reports published in the last four years that psychological changes can occur during the treatment of physical illness by Cortisone and corticotrophin (A.C.T.H.). There is no doubt, too, that similar mental symptoms have been occasioned by giving either of these agents in therapeutic doses. It is perhaps for this reason that most writers have not distinguished between them in this respect. Thus, the mild mood changes that often occur, and the relatively rare psychotic reactions are usually spoken of as complications of A.C.T.H. or Cortisone therapy. This implies that, in the individual case, these substances would be equivalent in their influence on the mental state; yet there are grounds for suspecting otherwise. The aetiology of these psychological reactions remains obscure, so that any evidence which serves to differentiate the psychiatric side-effects of the two drugs would be of interest.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 101 , Issue 422 , January 1955 , pp. 123 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1955 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Brody, S., Psychosomat. Med., 1952, 14, 93.Google Scholar
Clark, L. D., Bauer, W., and Cobb, S., New England J. Med., 1952, 246, 205.Google Scholar
Clark, L. D., Quarton, G. C., Cobb, S., and Bauer, W., New England J. Med., 1953, 249, 178.Google Scholar
Cohn, J. B., Steckler, G. A., and Rubinstein, J., J. Clin. Exper. Psychopath, 1953, 14, 161.Google Scholar
Fawcitt, J., Brit. J. Radiol., 1950, 23, 440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, G. H., Psychosomat. Med., 1953, 15, 280.Google Scholar
Goolker, P., and Schein, J., Psychosomat. Med., 1953, 15, 589.Google Scholar
Hench, P. S., Kendall, E. C., Slocumb, C. H., and Polley, H. F., Arch. Int. Med., 1950, 85, 545.Google Scholar
Hoagland, H., Pincus, G., Elmadjian, F., Romanoff, L., Freeman, H., Hope, J., Ballan, J., Berkeley, A., and Carlo, J., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1953, 69, 470.Google Scholar
Irons, E. N., Ayer, J. P., Brown, R. G., and Armstrong, S. H., J.A.M.A., 1951, 145, 861.Google Scholar
Lewis, A. J., and Fleminger, J. J., Lancet, 1954, i, 383.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. A., Rosenberg, E., and Wilkins, L., Endocrinology, 1950, 47, 414.Google Scholar
Lidz, T., Carter, J. D., Lewis, B. I., and Surratt, C., Psychosomat. Med., 1952, 14, 363.Google Scholar
Ransohoff, W., Brust, A. A., Reiser, M. F., Mirsky, I. A., and Ferris, E. B., Proc. 2nd Clin. A.C.T.H. Conf., 1951, 1, 160. London: Churchill.Google Scholar
Rees, L., J. Ment. Sci., 1953, 99, 497.Google Scholar
Reiss, M., Hemphill, R. E., Gordon, J. J., and Cook, E. R., Biochem. J., 1949, 45, 574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rome, H. P., and Braceland, F. J., J.A.M.A., 1952, 148, 27.Google Scholar
Rowntree, D. W., and Kay, W. W., J. Ment. Sci., 1952, 98, 100.Google Scholar
Sayers, G., and Sayers, M. A., Recent Progress in Hormone Research, 1948, 2. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.