Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T12:17:35.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Description and Interpretation of Pictures in Cases of Brain Lesion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

G. Ettlinger
G. Ettlinger*
Affiliation:
Psychological Laboratory, the Institute of Neurology, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Picture material may be “described” or “interpreted”. This distinction (further discussed in the section on Analysis of Results) is related in part to the complexity of the material, in part to the kind of response that is required. Defective description of pictures in cases of brain lesion has aroused little comment and has not been claimed to exist as an isolated disability. In contrast impaired interpretation of picture material has been more frequently found in association with disease or injury of the cerebral hemispheres. Moreover there is little agreement concerning the nature of this disability.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 106 , Issue 445 , October 1960 , pp. 1337 - 1346
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Critchley, M., The Parietal Lobes, 1953. London: E. Arnold.Google Scholar
Duensing, F., Arch. Psychiat. and Z. Neurol., 1954, 192, 185.Google Scholar
Ettlinger, G., Ph.D. Thesis, 1955. London University.Google Scholar
Idem , J. Neurol. Neur. and Psychiat., 1956, 19, 297.Google Scholar
Head, H., Aphasia and Kindred Disorders of Speech, 1926. 2 vol. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoppe, H. H., Trans. Amer. Neurol. Ass., 1921, 47, 247.Google Scholar
Lange, J. (in Vol. 6 of Bumke, O., and Foerster, O., editors), Handbuch der Neurologie, 1936, 6, 807. Berlin: J. Springer.Google Scholar
Milner, B., Res. Publ. Assoc. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1958, 36, 244.Google Scholar
Poppelreuter, W., Die Psychischen Schädigungen durch Kopfschuss im Kriege 1914-1918, 1917, Bd. I. Leipzig: L. Voss.Google Scholar
Scheller, H., and Seidemann, H., Mschr. Psychiat. Neurol., 1932, 81, 97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terman, L. M., and Merrill, M. A., Measuring Intelligence, 1937. London: George G. Harrap.Google Scholar
Weinstein, S., and Teuber, H. L., Arch. Neurol Psychiat., Chicago, 1956, 76, 369.Google Scholar
Wolpert, I., Z. ges. Neurol Psychiat., 1924, 93, 397.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.