Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:08:55.461Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Current Opinion on Medico-Psychological Questions in Germany, as represented by Professor Ludwig Meyer, of Göttingen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Extract

II. Criminal lunatics.—A brief note as to this class of patients will be of interest. Professor Meyer has very decided opinions as to their care and treatment. He fears that the practical outcome of advanced theories would be to change asylums into prisons—a change that would by no means possess the charm of novelty. According to some authorities the term “criminal lunatic” should be limited to such persons as were criminal before they became insane; others would include all insane persons who have committed an offence against the penal laws; some have even stretched the phrase to include all those whose mental condition would lead one to expect impulsive misdeeds, moral insanity, etc. The Academy of Medicine of Belgium gave an authoritative opinion on this subject in 1889. In answer to the inquiries of the Minister of Justice regarding criminal lunatics and criminal asylums, they resolved that these classes should be regarded as criminal, and should be relegated to a special institution— 1. Any insane person who has committed a criminal act. 2. Any criminal who has become insane after sentence. 3. Any insane person confined in an asylum who has committed or attempted a criminal act. In the special asylum, accommodation would be provided for all those insane persons presenting on examination homicidal irresistible and violent impulses, or similar evil habits.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1895 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

“Journ. Ment. Science,” Vol. 37., p. 174.Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.