Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T15:35:09.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A controlled trial of cavodil (Pheniprazine) in depression

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

T. E. Lear ,
M. W. Browne  and
J. A. Greeves
T. E. Lear
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University College Hospital, London, W.C.1
M. W. Browne
Affiliation:
Netherne Hospital, Coulsdon, Surrey. Formerly in the Department of Psychological Medicine, University College Hospital
J. A. Greeves
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Medicine, University College Hospital
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In reviewing controlled trials using mono-amine oxidase inhibitors in the treatment of depression it is soon obvious that workers vary as to whether they consider “depression” as a symptomatic mood change in diverse conditions or as a disease entity. Where the latter occurs, a variety of classifications of depressive illnesses appear, and that most widely used is the broad separation between endogenous and reactive depressions. Other points to note are the authors' definition of improvement, and particularly whether this refers to one aspect of the mental state only and whether the patient left hospital before receiving any treatment other than the drug.

Type
Clinical Trials
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 108 , Issue 457 , November 1962 , pp. 856 - 858
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1962 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Affleck, J. W., Forrest, A. D. and Martin, F. M. (1961). Ibid., 107, 997.Google Scholar
Ayd, F. J. (1960). Psychosomatics, 1, 2.Google Scholar
Bates, T. J. N. and Douglas, A. D. McL. (1961). J. Ment. Sci., 107, 538.Google Scholar
Cole, C. E., et al. (1959). A.M.A., Arch. Gen. Psychiat., i, 513.Google Scholar
Crisp, A. H., Hays, P. and Carter, A. (1961). Lancet, January 7th, 17.Google Scholar
Dally, P. J. and Rhodes, P. (1961). Lancet, January 7th, 18.Google Scholar
Dewhurst, W. G. and Pare, C. M. B. (1961). J. Ment. Sci., 107, 239.Google Scholar
Harris, J. A. and Robin, A. A. (1960). Ibid., 106, 1432.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, J. T. and Smedberg, D. (1960). Ibid., 106, 704.Google Scholar
Joshi, V. G. (1961). Ibid., 107, 567.Google Scholar
Kiloh, L. G., Child, J. P. and Latner, G. (1960). Ibid., 106, 1139.Google Scholar
Idem. (1960). Ibid., 106, 1425.Google Scholar
Middlefell, R, Frost, I, Egan, G. P. and Eaton, H. (1960). Ibid., 106, 1533.Google Scholar
Oakley, D. P. (1961). Ibid., 107, 1000.Google Scholar
Parem, C. M. B. and Sandler, M. (1959). J. Neurol, Neurosurg., Psychiat., 22, 24, 7.Google Scholar
Rees, L., Benaim, S. (1960). J. Ment. Sci., 106, 193.Google Scholar
Rees, L. and Davies, B. (1961). Ibid., 107, 560.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.