Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:19:21.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consanguinity and Mental Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

T. A. Munro*
Affiliation:
Research Department, Royal Eastern Counties Institution, Colchester

Extract

One difficulty which hinders the advance of psychiatry is that the facts of a mental disorder are not easy to describe and to record accurately. Many of the descriptive words used, such as “depression”, “confusion”, are taken from common speech and carry with them vague meanings. Out of sympathy with the sufferer, we tend to read our own emotions into the clinical picture. Moreover, because a disorder of thought and behaviour is a disorder of adaptation to living, the description of a mental disease involves not only the recording of the symptoms, but also a description of the circumstances and life-setting in which they occur. Another difficulty lies in the great variation in the clinical pictures of mental disorder. These vary so much that a diagnostic label such as affective psychosis or schizophrenia does not convey, and indeed is not intended to convey, an idea of a specific disease. These difficulties are somewhat more marked in the investigation of mental disorder in contrast to the investigation of mental defect. The statement that a patient is a Mongol or a cerebral diplegic conveys the idea of a fairly definite clinical syndrome, whereas a statement that a person suffers from schizophrenia calls up a much less clear mental picture. It seems that the only way out of this difficulty is to give a short statement of the clinical facts about each psychotic whom one discusses.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1938 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bell, Julia. —Personal communication, 1938.Google Scholar
2 Brugger, C.—“Psychiatrisch-genealogische Untersuchungen an neier Alläguer Landbevolkerung im Gebiete eines psychiatrischen Zensus,” Z. Neur., 1933, cxlv, p. 516.Google Scholar
3 Darwin, G. H.—“Marriages between First Cousins in England and their Effects”, J. Stat. Soc., 1875, xxxviii, p. 153.Google Scholar
4 Desruelles and Gardien.—“Consanguinité et troubles mentaux”, Ann. Méd. Psych., juillet, 1935.Google Scholar
5 Egenter, A.—“Über den Grad der Inzucht in einer Schweizer Berggemeinde und die damit zusammenhängende Häufung recessiver Erbschäden (Albinismus, Schwachsinn, Schizophrenie, etc.),” Arch. Julius Klaus Stiftung, 1934, ix, p. 365.Google Scholar
6 Grob, W.—“Aszendenzforschungen und Mortalitätsstatistik aus einer St. Gallischen Berggemeinde. Ein Beitrag zur Frage der Schädlichkeit der Inzucht,” ibid., 1934, ix, p. 237.Google Scholar
7 Huth, A. H.The Marriage of Near Kin, 1887; Longmans, Green & Co., London, second edition.Google Scholar
8 Latham, A. D., and Munro, T. A.—“Familial Myoclonus Epilepsy Associated with Deaf-mutism in a Family showing other Psychological Abnormalities”, Ann. Eugen., Camb., 1938, viii, p. 166.Google Scholar
9 Lucas, P.Traité philosophique et physiologique de l'hérédité naturelle dans les états de santé et maladies du système nerveux, Paris, 1847.Google Scholar
10 Lundborg, H.Medizinisch-biologische Familienforschungen innerhalb eines 2232-köpfigen Bauerngeschlechtes in Schweden, Jena, 1913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Mitchell, A.—“Blood Relationship in Marriage Considered in its Influence upon the Offspring”, Edin. Med. Journ., 1865.Google Scholar
12 Müller, T.—“Erforschung eines voralpinen Inzuchtgebiet mit familiärer Häufung von Schizophrenie, Psychopathie, und Oligophrenie sowie anderen heredo-degenerationen Merkmalen”, Arch. Julius Klaus Stiftung, 1933, viii, p. 247.Google Scholar
13 Munro, T. A.—“Familial Psychoses Associated with Endocrine Disorder”, Journ. Ment. Sci., 1937, lxxxiii, p. 707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Penrose, L. S.—“Genetic Problems in Mental Deficiency”, ibid., 1938, lxxxiv.Google Scholar
15 Idem. —“A Clinical and Genetic Study of 1,280 Cases of Mental Defect”, Sp. Rep. Ser. Med. Res. Coun., No. 229, H.M. Stationery Office, London, 1938.Google Scholar
16 Ruepp, G.—“Erbbiologie Bestandsaufnahme in einem Walderdorf der Voralpen. Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Vererbung des Schwachsinns und der Schizophrenie in einem Inzuchtsgebiet”, Arch. Julius Klaus Stiftung, 1935, x, p. 193.Google Scholar
17 Sjögren, T.Die juvenile Amaurotische Idiotie, Berlingska Boktryckeriet, Lund., 1931.Google Scholar
18 Voisin, A.—“Étude sur les marriages entre les consanguins dans la commune de Batz”, Ann. d'Hyg. et de Méd. Légale, avril, 1865.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.