Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:56:35.456Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Study of the Drawings Made by Various Clinical Groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

A. W. Martin  and
A. J. Weir
A. W. Martin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Research, The Crichton Royal, Dumfries
A. J. Weir
Affiliation:
Department of Psychological Research, The Crichton Royal, Dumfries
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the nineteenth century considerable attention was devoted to the art products of psychotics. The approach to these interesting phenomena was, however, unsystematized and of little value to psychopathology. Prinzhorn (1922) described the collection of psychotic art at Heidelberg. His monograph on the subject is a classic, but it has been pointed out by Elkisch (1945) that his analysis was not carried far enough to produce significant diagnostic criteria. In five recent articles Anastasi and Foley (1940, 1941) have made a comprehensive survey of work done on the whole field of the artistic behaviour of abnormal people. They have pointed out the inadequacies of research in this sphere: the lack of control groups of normal people, the generalizations made from a few selected data, and the constant danger of reciprocal projection.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 97 , Issue 408 , July 1951 , pp. 532 - 544
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1951 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anastasi, A., and Foley, J. P., jun., “A Survey of the Literature on Artistic Behaviour in the Abnormal : I. Historical and Theoretical Background,” J. Gen. Psychol., 1941, 25, 111–142. “II. Approaches and Interrelationships,” Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1941, 42, 1–112. “III. Spontaneous Productions,” Psychol. Monogr., 1940, 52, 237. “IV. Experimental Investigations,” J. Gen. Psychol., 1941, 25, 187–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iidem, “An Analysis of Spontaneous Artistic Productions by the Abnormal,” ibid., 1943, 28, 297–314.Google Scholar
Barclay, C. W., Ed.B. Thesis, Glasgow University, 1945.Google Scholar
Bell, , Elderkin, J., Projective Techniques, 1948. New York.Google Scholar
Elkisch, P., “Children's Drawings in a Projective Technique,” Psychol. Monogr., 1945, 58, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischer, R. O., and Hunt, J. McV., “A Communicable Method of Recording Areas in the Rorschach Test,” Amer. J. Psychol., 1941, 54, 580–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassi, J. R., and Levine, K. N., “The Graphic Rorschach Manual,” Psychiat. Quart., 1943, 17, 258–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lembke, W., “Uber Zeichnungen von ‘frechen’ und ‘schüchternen’ Kindern,” Zeitschr. f. pâd. Psychol., 1930, 31, 459–462. (As described in Anastasi and Foley (IV) above.)Google Scholar
Maclay, W. S., Guttman, E., and Mayer-Gross, W., “Spontaneous Drawings as an Approach to some Problems of Psychopathology,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1938, XXXI, 51–64.Google Scholar
Pfister, O., “Farbe und Bewegung in der Zeichnung Geisteskranker,” Schweiz. Arch. f. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1934, 34, 325–365. (As described in Anastasi and Foley (IV) above.)Google Scholar
Prinzhorn, H., Bildnerei der Geisteskranken; Ein Beitrag zur Psychologie und Psychopathologie der Gestaltung, 1922. Berlin.Google Scholar
Raven, J. C., Controlled Projection, 1951. H. K. Lewis, London.Google Scholar
Rorschach, H., Psychodiagnostics, 1942. Berne.Google Scholar
Ruesch, J., and Finesinger, J. E., “The Relation of the Rorschach Colour Response to the Use of Colour in Drawings,” Psychosom. Med., 1941, III, 4, 370–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidl-Waehner, T., “Formal Criteria for the Analysis of Children's Drawings,” Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1942, 12, 95–104.Google Scholar
Sherif, M., “A Study of Some Social Factors in Perception,” Arch. of Psychol., 1935, 187.Google Scholar
Schonbar, R. A., “The Interaction of Observer-Pairs in Judging Visual Extent and Movement,” ibid., 1945, 299.Google Scholar
Traube, T., “La Valeur Diagnostique des Dessins des Enfants Difficiles,” Arch. de Psychol., 1937, 26, 285–309. (As described in Anastasi and Foley (IV) above.)Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.