Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:08:33.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Body Size, Personality and Neurosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Linford Rees
Linford Rees*
Affiliation:
Wales and Monmouthshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

From time immemorial man has tended to classify his fellow beings into physical types associated with specific disease susceptibilities or characteristic mental or moral qualities. The ancient Hindus described three types of human physique likened to the elephant, the bull and the deer. Hippocrates formulated a dichotomy in build with a narrow type, the habitus phthisicus as one extreme and a broad type, the habitus apoplecticus, as the other.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 96 , Issue 402 , January 1950 , pp. 168 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1950 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aschner, B. (1924), “Die Konstitution der Frau und ihre Beziehung zur Geburtshilfe und Gynäkologie,” München.Google Scholar
Bakwen, H., and Bakwen, R. M. (1934), Am. J. Dis. Child, 48, 1030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beneke, F. W. (1878), Die anatomischen Grundlagen der Konstitutions-anomalien des Menschen, Marburg.Google Scholar
Brugsch, T. (1931), Die Biologie der Personen, 2, 1.Google Scholar
Burt, C. (1937), Brit. Med. J. Psychol., 17, 158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, C. (1944), Man., 72, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, H. D., and Krause, R. H. (1936), Child Develpm., 7, 60.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. I. (1938), J. Ment. Sci., 84, 495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. I. (1940), J. Ment. Sci., 86, 602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. I. (1941), Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 18, 323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draper, G. (1925), Human Constitution, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Himmelweit, H., and Rees, L. (1947), Dimensions of Personality, London.Google Scholar
Hammond, W. H. (1942), Man., 42, 3.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. (1932), Problems of Relative Growth, London.Google Scholar
MacAuliffe, L. (1925), Bull. Soc. l'Etude des Formes Humaines, Nos. 2 and 3, 155.Google Scholar
McCloy, C. H. (1940), Child. Develpm., 11, 249.Google Scholar
Mills, R. W. (1917), Am. J. Roentgenol, 4, 155.Google Scholar
Mullen, F. A. (1940), Child Develpm., 11, 27.Google Scholar
Rees, L. (1949), Factorial study of physical constitution in women, to be published.Google Scholar
Rees, L. and Eysenck, H. J. (1945). J. Ment. Sci., 91, 8.Google Scholar
Rostan, (1828), Cours Elémentaire d'Hygiene, Paris.Google Scholar
Sheldon, W. H. (1927), J. Personnel Research, 5, 447.Google Scholar
Sheldon, W. H. (1940), Varieties of Human Physique, New York and London.Google Scholar
Slater, E. T. O. (1943), J. Neurol., Neurosurg. and Psychiat., 6.Google Scholar
Stockard, C. R., Am. J. Anat., 31, 261.Google Scholar
Viola, G. (1919), La Constituzione Individuale, Bologna.Google Scholar
Von Rohden, (1927), Arch. Psychiat., 79, 786.Google Scholar
Weidenreich, F. (1926), Rasse und Körperbau, Berlin.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.