Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T14:00:06.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Body Concept

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

D. H. Bennett*
Affiliation:
Netherne Hospital, Coulsdon, Surrey

Extract

The need to clarify the “confusion in neurology and allied disciplines between the body image, the body schema, the body concept and the perceived body” was emphasized by Smythies (1953). For the neuropsychiatrist it is perhaps the disorders of the body schema and perceived body which are of the greatest interest and importance, but the confusion which still exists between the body concept and the body percept make it probable that a definition and examination of the body concept would clarify thinking about all Body Image problems.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1960 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bender, L., J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1940, 91, 277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, M. B., Green, M. A., and Fink, M., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1954, 72, 233.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E., Dementia Praecox (English translation), 1950. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Bousfield, W. A., and Barclay, W. D., J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem and Sedgewick, C. H. W., J. gen. Psychol., 1944, 30, 149.Google Scholar
Buehler, K., The Mental Development of the Child, 1930. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.Google Scholar
Cameron, N., in Personality and the Behaviour Disorders, 1944. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Chase, J. M., Character and Personality, 1941, 9, 208.Google Scholar
Cohn, R., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1953, 70, 503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, K., The Nude, 1956. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Copeland, L. P., A Controlled Investigation of the Reliability and Validity of Machover's Human Figure Drawing Projective Test, 1952. Amsterdam: N. V. de Arbeiderspers.Google Scholar
Critchley, M., Brain, 1953, 76, 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, G. J., J. Ment. Sci., 1933, 79, 305.Google Scholar
Eaton, H. S., Semantic Frequency List, 1940. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Flugel, J. C., The Psychology of Clothes, 1930. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Foley, J. P., and MacMillan, Z. L., J. exp. Psychol., 1943, 33, 299.Google Scholar
Goodenough, F. L., Measurement of Intelligence by Drawings, 1926. Chicago: World Book Co.Google Scholar
Head, H., and Holmes, G., Brain, 1911, 34, 102.Google Scholar
James, W., Principles of Psychology, 1890. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Keller, H., The World I Live In, 1908. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Lhermitte, J., L'Image de Notre Corps, 1939. Paris: Nouvelle Revue Critique.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, B., Nerv. Child., 1948, 7, 45.Google Scholar
Lowenfeld, V., The Nature of Creative Activity, 1939. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Luquet, G. H., Les Dessins d'un Enfant, 1913. Paris.Google Scholar
Machover, K., Personality Projection in the Drawing of the Human Figure, 1949. Springfieid, Ill.: Thomas.Google Scholar
McKeller, P., Imagination and Thinking, 1957. London: Cohen and West.Google Scholar
Mott, S. M., J. genet. Psychol., 1936, 48, 199.Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E., Method and Theory in Experimental Psychology, 1953. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paget, G. W., J.R. anthrop. Inst., 1932, 62, 127.Google Scholar
Penfield, W., and Rasmussen, T., The Cerebral Cortex of Man, 1950. New York: Macmillan.Google ScholarPubMed
Reitman, F., Psychotic Art, 1950. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Révész, G., Psychology and Art of the Blind, 1950. London: Longmans Green.Google Scholar
Riddoch, G., Brain, 1941, 64, 197.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. P. S., Personal communication, 1958.Google Scholar
Schilder, P., The Image and Appearance of the Human Body, 1935. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Secord, P. F., J. Person., 1953, 21, 479.Google Scholar
Shontz, F. C., J. Clin. Psychol., 1956, 12, 293.3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, A. B., and Klee, G. D., J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1958, 127, 323.Google Scholar
Smith, E., J. clin. Psychol., 1953, 9, 183.Google Scholar
Smythies, J. R., Brain, 1953, 76, 132.Google Scholar
Stockert, F. G. von, Nervenarzt, 1952, 23, 121.Google Scholar
Stonesifer, F. A., J. clin. Psychol., 1949, 5, 396.Google Scholar
Swensen, C. H., Psych. Bull., 1957, 54, 431.Google Scholar
Szasz, T. S., Psychosom. Med., 1957, 19, 11.Google Scholar
Tait, C. D., and Ascher, R. C., Psychosom. Med., 1955, 17, 139.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L., Thorndike English Dictionary, 1948. London: English Universities Press.Google Scholar
Whitehorn, J. C., and Zipf, G. K., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1943, 49, 831.Google Scholar
Woëlfflin, H., Principles of Art History, 1932. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Worchel, P., and Dallenbach, K. M., Amer. J. Psychol., 1947, 60, 502 Google Scholar
Wright, G. H., Brain, 1956, 79, 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipf, G. K., J. genet. Psychol., 1945, 33, 251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , Human Behaviour and the Principle of Least Effort, 1949. Cambridge, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.