No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2018
Dr. Ludwig Meyer, of Hamburg, has had the courage to defend the non-restraint system in Germany, and also himself to practise it in the Hamburg Asylum with the best success. It is true that Dr. Meyer had previously visited England, and examined with careful eyes, impartial goodwill, and practical mind, the non-restraint system. Why do not such physicians as Casimir Pinel of Paris, Renaudin of Mareville, Dick of Klingmünster, Neumann of Pöpelwitz, and Erlenmayer of Coblenz, visit England also, and with the same honest intentions as Meyer, study a system which has been practised here for more than twenty years amongst a population of insane amounting to 50,000 patients? It must be a messing to suffering humanity and a disgrace to those who have the boldness not only to assert that they do not comprehend these facts, but also to call the system an English swindle, to hear the voice of Dr. L. Meyer in the Desert of German Restraint.
∗ Casimir Pinei, ‘Journal de Medicine Mentale,’ 1862.Google Scholar
“ Examen de non-restraint. ‘Guialain,’ Leçons Orales,’ tom. iii, p. 232, c'est Pinei qui a conçu le premier l'idée de renoncer aux moyens de contrainte.Google Scholar
† Guillain, ‘Leçons Orales,’ tom. iii, p. 231.Google Scholar
∗ See Reisebericht von Welling, ‘Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Phychiatre,’ vol. xiii, p. 54.Google Scholar
† ‘Ferros des Alienés,’ p. 64.Google Scholar
∗ Griesinger, ‘Die Pathologie der Psychischen Krankheiten,’ 1861, p. 606,Google Scholar
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.