Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:14:40.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adaptation and Conditioning of the Galvanic Skin Response in Psychiatric Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

M. A. Stewart
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri U.S.A.
G. Winokur
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri U.S.A.
J. A. Stern
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri U.S.A.
S. B. Guze
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri U.S.A.
E. Pfeiffer
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri U.S.A.
F. Hornung
Affiliation:
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri U.S.A.

Extract

There is a considerable literature dealing with the relation of anxiety to conditioning performance in human subjects. When compared with normal subjects, those with marked anxiety have been observed to show more rapid conditioning and slower extinction of certain responses. Typical observations have been those of Taylor (17) concerning conditioned eyelid responses, and of Welch (20), and Bitterman and Holtzman (3), concerning the galvanic skin response. In contrast, Bindra et al. (2) found no difference in the conditioning of salivary responses between anxious and non-anxious subjects.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1959 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Bender, , Lauretta, and Schilder, P., “Unconditioned and conditioned reactions to pain in schizophrenia”, Amer. J. Psychiat., 1930, 87, 365384.Google Scholar
2. Bindra, D., Paterson, A. L. and Strzelecki, J., “On the relation between anxiety and conditioning”, Canad. J. Psychol., 1955, 9, 16.Google Scholar
3. Bitterman, M. E. and Holtzman, W. H., “Conditioning and extinction of the galvanic skin response as a function of anxiety”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 615623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Franks, C. M., “Conditioning and personality: a study of normal and neurotic subjects”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 143150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Guk, E. D., “The conditioned reflex activity of schizophrenics”, Sovetsk. Nevropatol. , 1934, 7684, (Psychol. Abstr., 1935, 9, No. 717).Google Scholar
6. Howe, E. S., “GSR conditioning in anxiety states, normals and chronic functional schizophrenic subjects”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1958, 56, 183189.Google Scholar
7. Ivanov-Smolensky, A. G., “Uber die bedingten Reflexe in der depressiven Phase des manisch-depressiven Irreseins”, Mschr. Psychiat. Neurol. 1925, 58, 376388.Google Scholar
8. Landkof, B. L., “Unconditioned and conditioned vascular reflexes in schizophrenics”, Trud. Tsentral. Psikhonevrol. Inst., 1938, 10, 3763, (Psychol Abstr., 1938, 12, No. 5343).Google Scholar
9. Mays, L. L., “Studies of catatonia: V. Perseverational tendencies in catatonic patients” Psychiat. Quart., 1934, 8, 728735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Mirolyubov, N. G. and Ugol, N. B., “The problem of the state of the process of excitation in schizophrenics”, Sovrem. Psikhonevrol , 1933, 6982, (Psychol. Abstr., 1935, 9, No. 1260).Google Scholar
11. Passey, G. E., “The influence of the intensity of unconditioned stimulus upon acquisition of a conditioned response”, J. exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 420428.Google Scholar
12. Pfaffman, C. and Schlosberg, H., “The conditioned knee jerk in psychotic and normal individuals”, J. Psychol., 1936, 1, 201205.Google Scholar
13. Reese, W. G., Doss, R., and Horsley Gantt, W., “Autonomic responses in differential diagnosis of organic and psychogenic psychoses”, Arch. Neur. Psych., 1953, 70, 778793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Shipley, W. C., “Studies in catatonia: V. Perseverational tendencies in catatonic patients”, Psychiat. Quart., 1934, 8, 736744.Google Scholar
15. Spence, K. W., “Learning and performance in eyelid conditioning as a function of the intensity of the UCS”, J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 5763.Google Scholar
16. Spence, K. W., Haggard, D. F., and Ross, L. E., “UCS intensity and the associative (habit) strength of the eyelid CR”, J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 55, 404412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Taylor, Janet A., “The relationship of anxiety to the conditioned eyelid response”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1951, 41, 81–02.Google Scholar
18. Taylor, Janet A. and Spence, K. W., “Conditioning level in the behaviour disorders”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 497502.Google Scholar
19. Thorndike, E. L., as quoted by Spence, K. W. in Handbook of Experimental Psychology, 1957, Wiley, p. 708.Google Scholar
20. Welch, L., “Human conditioning and anxiety”, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1953, 56, 266272.Google Scholar
21. Wheeler, E. O., White, P. D., Reed, E. W., and Cohen, M. E., “Neurocirculatory asthenia (anxiety neurosis, effort syndrome, neurasthenia); a 20 year follow-up study of 173 cases”, J.A.M.A., 1950, 142, 878889.Google Scholar
22. Winokur, G., Guze, S. B., Stewart, M. A., Pfeiffer, E., Stern, J. A., and Hornung, F., “The association of conditionability with degree of reactivity in psychiatric patients”. To be published in Science. Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.