Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:14:07.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toward an Integrated Theory of Schizophrenia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Emil G. Conason
Affiliation:
New York, N. Y.
Percy E. Ryberg
Affiliation:
Falkirk Hospital, Central Valley, New York

Extract

Evidence is accumulating that schizophrenia is a disease involving “immunoallergic” sensitization of the tissues of the central nervous system. Variations in its symptomatology may in part depend upon the altered ability of the sensitized nervous tissue to bind or release serotonin, and perhaps other endogenous catechol amines. Accumulation of these products; their rates of turnover; the presence of endogenous enzyme enhancers or inhibitors; specific endocrine dyscrasias; blood-brain barrier conditioners; as well as cellular changes in electrolytes, may all play a part in the process. Genetic defects; lags in maturation; autonomic imbalance and pre-psychotic personality structure may lurk in the background.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1958 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1a. CONASON, E. G., and Ryberg, P. E., Dis. Nerv. Syst. (Monograph Suppt.), July, 1957, 18, 3.Google Scholar
1b. Brodie, B. B., Shore, P. A., and Pletscher, A., Science, 1956, 123, 992.Google Scholar
2. Wooley, D. W., Science, 1957, 125, 752.Google Scholar
3. Shore, P. A., and Brodie, B. B., Proc. Soc. Biol. Med., 1957, 94, 433.Google Scholar
4. Brodie, B. B., and Shore, P. A., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1957, 66, 631.Google Scholar
5. Weissbach, H., Waalkes, T. R., and Udenfreind, S., Science, 1957, 125, 235.Google Scholar
6. Humphries, J. H., and Jacques, R., J. Physiol., 1955, 128, 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Herxheimer, H., J. Physiol., 1955, 128, 435.Google Scholar
8. Waalkes, T. R., et al., J. Pharmacol. Exptl. Therap., 1957. In Press.Google Scholar
9. Fink, M. A., Proc. Soc. Exptl. Biol. Med., 1956, 92, 657.Google Scholar
10. Ehrentheil, O. F., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1957, 77, 178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Funkenstein, D. H., Greenblatt, M., and Solomon, H., J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1951, 114, 1.Google Scholar
12. Idem, Scientific American, 1955. May.Google Scholar
13 Perrin, G. M., and Altschule, M. D., New Eng. J. Med., 1957, 256, 682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Thomas, L., Ann. Rev. Physiol., 1954, 16, 467.Google Scholar
15. Idem, Bull. N. Y. Acad. Med., 1955, 31, 485.Google Scholar
16. Idem, J. Exptl. Med., 1956, 104, 865.Google Scholar
17. Idem, Ciba Medical News, 1957. 20 May. Press release.Google Scholar
18. Anderson, J. R., et al., Lancet, 1957, ii, 1123.Google Scholar
19. WITEBSKY, E., and Rose, N. R., J. Immunol., 1956, 76, 408.Google Scholar
20. Rose, N. R., and Witebsky, E., ibid., p. 417.Google Scholar
21. Roitt, I. M., et al., Lancet, 1956, ii, 820.Google Scholar
22. Leach, B., and Heath, R. G., Ciba Medical News , 1957. 3 June; Amer. J. Psychiatry, 1957. July.Google Scholar
23. Raffel, S., Immunity, 1953. New York: Appleton Century Croft.Google Scholar
24. Bender, L., and Nichtern, S., N.Y. State J. Med., 1956. 15 September.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.