Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:59:03.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Rorschach Test in Epileptics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Arthur Guirdham
Arthur Guirdham*
Affiliation:
Bailbrook House, Bath; late Medical Officer, Brentwood Mental Hospital, Essex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The application of the above test to epileptics is a useful subject for an article, firstly because Rorschach's findings for epileptics were established from a very small number of patients; secondly, there was, in his investigations, no subdivision of epileptics into mental categories other than those of “early” and “late” demented; thirdly, the references in literature to the application of this test to epileptics are so meagre; and fourthly, the results obtained in this particular investigation show a considerable diversity from those of Rorschach.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 81 , Issue 335 , October 1935 , pp. 870 - 893
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1935 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, S. J.—“The Rorschach Test and Personality Diagnosis,” Amer. Journ. Psychiat., 1930, x, pp. 19–52.Google Scholar
Idem. —“Personality Diagnosis by Means of the Rorschach Test,” Amer. Journ. Orthopsychiat., 1930, i, pp. 81–8.Google Scholar
Idem. —“The Rorschach Test in Problem Children,” ibid., 1931. i, pp. 501–9.Google Scholar
Idem. —“The Rorschach Test as applied to a Feeble-minded Group,” Arch. Psychol., 1932, xxi, No. 136, p. 84.Google Scholar
Idem. —“Configurational Tendencies in Rorschach Responses,” Psychol. Bull., 1932, xxix, p. 632.Google Scholar
Idem. —“The Rorschach Method and the Organization of Personality,” Amer. Journ. Orthopsychiat., four articles from October, 1933.Google Scholar
Idem and Levy, D. M.—“The Rorschach Test in Manic-Depressive Psychosis,” pp. 167–81, Proc. XI Meeting Assoc. Research Nerv, and Ment. Dis., 1930.Google Scholar
Bleuler, M.—“Der Rorschachsche Formdeutversuch bei Geschwistern” [The Rorschach Form Interpretation Experiment in Siblings], Zeitschr. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1929, cxviii, pp. 366–98.Google Scholar
Idem and Wertham, F.—“Inconstancy of the Formal Structure of Personality: Experimental Study of the Influence of Mescaline on the Rorschach Test,” Arch. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1932, xxviii, pp. 52–70.Google Scholar
Cantril, H., and Allport, G. W.—“Recent Application of the Study of Values,” Journ. Abnor. and Soc. Psychol., 1934.Google Scholar
Enke, W.—“Die Konstitutionstypen im Rorschachschen Experiment,” Zeitschr. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1927, cviii, pp. 645–74.Google Scholar
Idem. —“Experimentalpsychologische Studien zur Konstitutionsforschung; Sinnes- und denk-psychologische Untersuchungen,” ibid., 1928, cxiv, pp. 770–94.Google Scholar
Gordon, R. G., and Norman, R. M.—“Some Psychological Experiments on Mental Defectives in Relation to the Perceptual Configurations which may Underlie Speech,” Part II, Brit. Journ. Psychol., 1932, xxiii, pp. 85–113.Google Scholar
Juarros, C, and Soriano, M.—“Le psychodiagnostic de Rorschach chez les enfants anormaux,” Compt. rend, de la IV Conf. Int. de Psycho-tech., pp. 595–605, Paris, Alcan, 1929. Also published in Spanish—Siglo méd., 1927, lxxx, pp. 413–17.Google Scholar
Kerr, Madeline. —“The Rorschach Test Applied to Children,” Brit. Journ. Psychol., Part II, 1934, xxv, p. 170.Google Scholar
Kluever, H.—“An Analysis of Recent Work on the Problem of Types,” Journ. Nerv, and Ment. Dis., 1925, lxii, pp. 561–96.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, E.—Discussion of paper by Veit on “The Rorschach Test as an Aid to Clinical Diagnosis”, Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1927, xlv, p. 840.Google Scholar
Loepfe, A.—“Rorschachsche Formdeutversuche mit 10–13 jahrigen Knaben,” Zeitschr. f. angew. Psychol., 1925, xxvi, pp. 202–253. Abstr. Zentralbl. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1926, xliii, p. 379.Google Scholar
Loosli-Usteri, M.—“Test de Rorschach appliqué à différents groupes d'enfants de 10-13 ans,” Arch. de Psychol., 1929, xxii, pp. 51–106.Google Scholar
MacCalman, D. R.—“The Rorschach Test and its Clinical Application,” Journ. Ment. Sci., 1933, lxxix, No. 325, pp. 419–23.Google Scholar
Mazkevic, A.—“The Technique of Discovering Latent Pathological Complexes by Rorschach's Method,” Trudy Ukrain. Psichnevr. Inst., 1931, xv, pp. 44–51 (in Russian). Abstr. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1932, lxi, P. 585.Google Scholar
Meltzer, H.—“Personality Differences among Stutterers as Indicated by the Rorschach Test,” Amer. Journ. Orthopsychiat., 1934, xiv, Ap. No. 2.Google Scholar
Mira, E.—“Sobre el valor del psichodiagnostico de Rorschach,” Prog. de la Clin., 1925, xxxii, pp. 808–45.Google Scholar
Idem. —“Exploración de la afectividad “[Investigation of Emotionality], Rev. méd. de Barcelona, 1930, xiv, pp. 222–59. Abstr. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1931–32, lxi, p. 541.Google Scholar
Monnier, M.—“Le Test Psychologique de Rorschach,” L'Encéphale, 1934, xxix, pp. 189–201, 247–70. Extract, pp. 198–200.Google Scholar
Morgenthaler, W.—Personal communication.Google Scholar
Muller, M.—“Der Rorschachsche Formdeutversuch, seine Schwierigkeiten und Ergebnisse,” Zeitschr. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1929, cxviii, pp. 598–620. Abstr. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1929, liii, p. 571.Google Scholar
Muller, O.—“Beiträge zur Lehre menschlicher Typen nach der Methode unvollständiger Reizdarbeitung,” Zeitschr. f. Psychol., 1929, cxi, pp. 51–145, Extract.Google Scholar
Munz, E.—“Die Reaktion des Pyknikers im Rorschachschen psychodiagnostischen Versuch “[The Reaction of the Pyknic Type to Rorschach's Psychodiagnostic Test], Zeitschr. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1924, xci, pp. 26–92. Abstr. Zentralbl. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1924, xxxviii, p. 432.Google Scholar
Neymann, C. A., and Kohlstedt, D.—“A New Diagnostic Test for Introversion-Extraversion,” Journ. Abnor. and Soc. Psychol., 1929, xxiii, pp. 482–7.Google Scholar
Oberholzer, E.—“Zur Differentialdiagnose Psychischer Folgezustände nach Schädel trau men mittels des Rorschachschen “[The Differential Diagnosis of the Mental Sequels of Cranial Injuries by Means of Rorschach's Test], Zeitschr. f. d. Google Scholar
ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1931, cxxxvi, pp. 596–629. Abstr. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1932, lxiii, p. 100.Google Scholar
Oeser, O. A.—“Some Experiments on the Abstraction of Form and Colour: Part II, Rorschach Tests,” Brit. Journ. Psychol., 1932, xxii, pp. 287–323.Google Scholar
Pfahler, G.—“System der Typenlehre, Grundlegung einer pedagogischen Typenlehre,” Zeitschr. f. Psychol., Eng. Bd., 1929, xv, pp. 1–334. Abstr. Zentralbl. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1929, liii, pp. 579–81.Google Scholar
Pfister, O.—“Ergebnisse des Rorschachschen Versuches bei Oligophrenen,” Allg. Zeitschr. f. Psychiat., 1925, lxxxii, pp. 198–223. Abstr. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1926, xliii, p. 465.Google Scholar
Poppinga, O.—“Die teilinhaltliche Beachtung von Form und Farbe bei Erwachsenen in ihrer Beziehung zur Strukturpsychologischen Typenlehre,” Zeitschr. f. Psychol., 1931, cxxi, pp. 137–77. Abstr. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1932, lxii, p. 171.Google Scholar
Rorschach, H.—Psychodiagnostik, Hans Huber, Berne, 1932.Google Scholar
Idem and Oberholzer, E.—“Zur Auswertung des Formdeutversuchs fur die Psychoanalyse,” Journ. Nerv, and Ment. Dis., 1924, lx, pp. 225–48, 359–79.Google Scholar
Schneider, E.—“Die Bedeutung des Rorschachschen Formdeutversuches zur Ermittlung intellektuell gehemmter Schüler,” Zeitschr. f. Angen. Psychol., 1929, xxxii, pp. 102–63. Abstr. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1929, liii, p. 572.Google Scholar
Skalweit, . —“Praktische-diagnostische Verwertung des Rorschachschen Formdeutversuches,” Vero Norddeutsch. Psychiat. u. Neurol. Kiel. Sitzy., 1931, x, pp. 24–5. Abstr. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1932, lxiii, p. 21.Google Scholar
Soukup, F.—“Studium osobrosti a Rorschachuv Pokus,” Casop tek cesk., 1931, lxx, pp. 881–2. English summary, p. 886.Google Scholar
Struve, K.—“Typische Ablaufsformen des Deutens bei 14 bis 15—jahrigen Schulkinder,” Zeitschr. f. angew. Psychol., 1930, xxxvii, pp. 204–74. Abstr. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1931, lix, p. 434.Google Scholar
Veit, H.—“Der Rorschachsche Versuch als klinisches Hilfsmittel “[Rorschach's Test as a Clinical Aid], XLIX Jahresversammlung der Sudwestdtsch. Psychiat. Freiburg, 1926. Abstr. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1927, xlv, p. 840.Google Scholar
Idem. —“Der Parkinsonismus nach Encephalitis epidemica im Rorschachschen Formdeutversuch,” Zeitschr. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1927, cx, pp. 301–24. Abstr. Zentralbl. f. d. ges. Neurol. u. Psychiat., 1928, xlix, p. 439.Google Scholar
Vernon, P. E.—“The Rorschach Ink Blot Test,” Brit. Journ. Med. Psychol., 1933, xiii, Pt. II, p. 89; Pt. III, p. 179; Pt. IV, p. 271.Google Scholar
Idem. —“The American v. the German Approach to the Study of Personality,” Brit. Journ. Psychol., 1933, xxiv.Google Scholar
Idem. —“Some Characteristics of the Good Judge of Personality,” Journ. Soc. Psychol., 1933, iv.Google Scholar
Idem and Allport, G. W.—“A Test for Personal Values,” Journ. Abnor. and Soc. Psychol., 1932, xxvi, pp. 231–48.Google Scholar
Wells, F. L.—“Evaluation of Personality and Character Tests “(subsection of “Contributions of Psychology to the Understanding of Problems of Personality and Behaviour”), Amer. Journ. Orthopsychiat., October, 1932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertham, F.—“Progress in Psychiatry: Experimental Type Psychology,” Arch. of Neurol. and Psychiat., September, 1930, xxiv, No. 3, p. 604.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.