Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T11:18:16.457Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relationship of Electroencephalography to Psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Denis Hill
Denis Hill*
Affiliation:
Sutton Emergency Hospital, Surrey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The technique of electroencephalography has become to neurophysiology what the microscope is to histology. It is probable that by this technique neurophysiologists will achieve a comprehensive knowledge of the functional organization of the brain. While the EEG has been used most successfully for this type of research, it has also been applied with no less enthusiasm to clinical problems of neurology and psychiatry. In certain cerebral disorders, for example epilepsy, where knowledge had already made considerable advance, the EEG technique was immediately found to have application. But in what may be called “the problems of function” provided by the main psychiatric reactions of schizophrenia and manic-depression, and in relation to individual differences of temperament, intelligence and personality, in all these the EEG has so far proved of little value.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 91 , Issue 384 , July 1945 , pp. 281 - 289
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1945 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Darrow, C. W. (1943), Physiological Reviews, 23, 1.Google Scholar
Idem , Green, J. R., Davis, E. W., and Garol, H. W. (1944), J. Neurophysiol., 4, 217–226.Google Scholar
Davis, H., and Davis, P. A. (1939), Ass. Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis. Proc., 19, 50.Google Scholar
Davis, H., and Wallace, W. McL. (1942), Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., (Chicago), 47, 606.Google Scholar
Fleischhacker, H. H. (1943), J. Ment. Sci., 89, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, E. L., Gibbs, P. A., Lennox, W. G., and Nims, L. F. (1942), Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., (Chicago), 47, 879–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M., personal communication.Google Scholar
Golla, F. L., Hutton, E. L., and Walter, W. Grey (1943), J. Ment. Sci., 89, 261.Google Scholar
Gottlober, A. B. (1938), J. Exp. Psychol., 22, 67.Google Scholar
Heppenstall, M. E. (1944), J. Neurol., Neurosurg. and Psychiat., July/Oct., 7, 112.Google Scholar
Idem and Hill, D. (1943), Lancet, 261.Google Scholar
Idem , Hill, D., and Slater, E. (in press).Google Scholar
Hill, D., Sargant, W., and Heppenstall, M. E. (1943), Lancet, 526.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S., Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. Google Scholar
Jackson, H. (1932), Selected Papers, 1 and 2. London.Google Scholar
Lemere, F. (1936), Brain, 59, 366.Google Scholar
Lennox, W. G., Gibbs, F. E., and Gibbs, A. L. (1940), Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., (Chicago), 44, 1, 155.Google Scholar
Penfield, W., and Erickson, T. C. (1941), Epilepsy and Cerebral Localization. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushmer, R. F., and Bond, D. D. (1944), War Medicine, 5, No. 5, 302.Google Scholar
Sargant, W. (1940), Lancet, 314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, W. Grey (1943), Electronic Engineering, June, p. 9.Google Scholar
Idem (1944), “Recent Progress in Psychiatry,” J. Ment. Sci., 90, 64.Google Scholar
Idem (1944), Proc. EEG Society (unpublished).Google Scholar
Idem and Dovey, V. S. (1944), ibid. Annual Report.Google Scholar
Williams, D. (1941), J. Neurol. Psychiat., 4, 257.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.