Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:23:35.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Placebo Response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

R. W. Tibbetts  and
J. R. Hawkings
R. W. Tibbetts
Affiliation:
From the Midland Hospital for Nervous Diseases, United Birmingham Hospitals
J. R. Hawkings
Affiliation:
From the Midland Hospital for Nervous Diseases, United Birmingham Hospitals
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In recent controlled trials, conducted by the authors (1956), we were interested to note the proportion of patients improving with the administration of placebos. A placebo is defined in the Shorter Oxford Dictionary (1944) as “A medicine given more to please than to benefit the patient”. It is presumed that, implicit in this definition, is the qualification that the doctor is aware of the relatively inert qualities of the substance, whilst the patient is not. There is, of course, a type of patient who derives considerable benefit mainly by virtue of the fact that he has been pleased. In spite of the discovery of increasing numbers of drugs with specific properties, the prescription of placebos is still common practice. Dunlop et al. (1952) analysed over 17,000 prescriptions of which about one-third were tonics, stomachics or sedatives; although barbiturates cannot strictly be called placebos, the spirit in which they are prescribed frequently puts them near to this category.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 102 , Issue 426 , January 1956 , pp. 60 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atoynatan, T. H., Goldstone, S., Goldsmith, J., and Cohen, L. D., Psychiat. Quart., 1954, 28, 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beecher, H. K., Keats, A. S., Mosteller, F., and Lasagna, L., J. Pharmacol., 1953, 109, 393.Google Scholar
Bleuler, E., Textbook of Psychiatry, 1924. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dorland, W. A. N., The American Illustrated Medical Dictionary, 1951. Philadelphia and London: Saunders.Google Scholar
Dunlop, D. M., Henderson, T. L., and Inch, R. S., Brit. med. J., 1952, i, 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, Ltd.Google Scholar
Frank, J. A., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1953, 110, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, A., J. Ment. Sci., 1954, 100, 718.Google Scholar
Hawkings, J. R., and Tibbetts, R. W., J. Ment. Sci., 1956, 102, 43.Google Scholar
Idem , Ibid., 1956, 102, 52.Google Scholar
Lasagna, L., Mosteller, F., von Felsinger, J. M., and Beecher, H. K., Amer. J. Med., 1954, 16, 770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meduna, L. J., Carbon Dioxide Therapy, 1950. Springfield, Illinois, U.S.A.: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Sargant, W., Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1952, 45, 515.Google Scholar
The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary, 1944. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, S., J. Clin. Invest., 1950, 29, 100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem and Pinsky, R. H., J. Amer. med. Ass., 1954, 155, 339.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.