Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:08:41.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Physiology and Pathology of the Sympathetic System of Nerves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

A. Eulenburg
Affiliation:
Univ. of Greifswald
P. Guttmann
Affiliation:
Univ. of Berlin

Extract

This connection may result—

1st. From the presence of symptoms which resemble, or are identical with, those which we recognise as expressions of the physiological function of the sympathetic, and which we have enumerated and explained in the former part of this essay.

2ndly. From pathological anatomical changes in the sym pathetic nerve.

Those conditions usually go together, but not invariably; thus, the pathological alterations may be completely wanting, or, on the other hand, they may be found in cases which were not before suspected to have any connection with the sympa thetic system.

We begin with the consideration of the affections of the cervical sympathetic, afterwards taking up those which pro bably have relation to some change in the thoracic and abdominal portions of that nerve.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1878 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* It should be stated that it was for this Essay that the Astley Cooper Prize for 1877 was originally awarded to Dre. E Ulenburg and Guttmann—a decision, however, which was subsequently overthrown on the technical ground that the paper was the work of two authors, and not of one only—as the terms of Sir A. Cooper's will seem to require. This essay having been handed in in October, 1876) there are no references to any papers on the subject written since then. Google Scholar

* In Poiteau'e comparative observations (“Archiv, gen. de Med,” 1869, Août) there are nineteen cases of paralysis and nine of irritation of the cervical svmpathetic. Google Scholar

Willebrandt, “Archiv, für Ophthalmologie,” 1865, Bd. I., p. 319. Google Scholar

Ogle, “Medico-Chirurgi cal Transactions,” T. zìi., p. 398. Google Scholar

§ Heineke, “Greifswalder med. Beiträge,” I860, Bd. ii. Google Scholar

Verneuil, Gax. des hôpitaux, “1864, 16 Aprel. 1 Ogle,” Lancet,” 17 April, 1869. Google Scholar

Du Moulin, “Bullet, de la Soo. do Méd. de Gand.,” 1872. I Fränkel, “Berliner klinische Wochenschrift,” 1875, No. 3. § Ogle, 44 Med. Chir. Transactions,” T. xli., p. 398. Google Scholar

Demme, “Würzburger med. Zeitschrift,“1862, Bd. iii., p. 262 and 269. t Vulpian,” Leçons sur l'appareil vasomoteur.” Paris, 1875, p. 142. Google Scholar

S. Weir Mitchell, George Β. Morehouse, and William Keen—“Gunshot Wounds and other Injuries of Nerves.” Philadelphia, 1864. Google Scholar

Kämpf, Sitzung der Κ. K. Gesellschaft der Aerzte in Wienarn, 8 März· 1872. Google Scholar

Seeligmüller, “Berliner klin. Wochenschrift,” 1872, No 4. Google Scholar

Nicati, “La Paralysie da nerf sympathique cervical.” Lausanne, 1873. t Bernhardt, “Berliner klin. Wochenschrift,” 1872, No. 47 and 48. Google Scholar

* Seeligmüller, “Archiv, für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten,” 1875, Bd. v., p. 835. Google Scholar

Bendu, dee troubles fonctionels du grand sympathique, observés dans lee plaies de la Moëlle cervicale. “Arohiv. gen. de méd.,” 1869, Sept., p. 286-297. Google Scholar

* Hutchinson,” Lancet/' 1875, 21 and 29 May. Google Scholar

M. Rosenthal, “Oesterr. Zeitschiift für pract. Heilkunde/1860, No. 46. t Bäerwinkel,” Archiv, für kl in. Medicin/' Band xiv., p. 545. Google Scholar

Hutchinson, “Med. Times and Gaz.” 1868, p. 584. Google Scholar

Seeligmüller, “Ueber Sympathicus-Affectionen bei Verletzung des Plexus brachialis,” Beri. klin. Wochenschrift, 1870, No. 26. Google Scholar

* Báerwinkel, “Zur Pathologie des Sympathicus.” Deutsches Arohiv. für klinische Medicin. Bd. xiv., p. 646. Google Scholar

* Nitzeinadel, “Ueber nervöse Hyperidrosis und Anidrosis,” Jena, 1867, Inang. Dissert. Google Scholar

Meschede, “Virchow's Arohiv.” Bd. xliii., p. 139. Google Scholar

Berger, “Virchow's Archiv,” li., p. 427. Google Scholar

Wiegemeister, “Virchow's Archiv:” Bd Iii., p. 437. Google Scholar

§ Otto, “Archiv, für klin. Medicin.” Band xl, Heft & H Nitzeinadel, L. o. Google Scholar

% Bäerwinkel, “Archiv, für klin. Medicin,” 1874. Bd. xiv., p. 550. Google Scholar

** Külz, “Beiträge Znr Pathologie nnd Therapie des Diabetes,” 1874, pp. 23 and 27. Google Scholar

++ Chvostek, “Wiener med. Wochenshrift,” 1872. No. 19 and 20. ÎX Pokroffsky, “Berliner klin. Wochenschrift,” 1875. No. 13. %% Seguin, “American Journal of Medical Soienoee,” Oct., 1872. Google Scholar

* Ebstein,” Virchow's Archiv.,'» 1876. Bd.lxii, p. 435. Google Scholar

* Da Bois-Rey mond, “Zar Kenntaiss der Hemikranie, Archiv, für Anat. und Phye.,” I860, p. 461-468. Google Scholar

* Brnnner, “Zar Casuistik der Pathologie des Sympathicus.” Petersburger med. Zeitschrift, N. T. Bd. ii., 1871, p. 260. Google Scholar

Berger, “Zur Pathogenese der Hemicranie.” Virchow's Archiv, lix., Heft 3 and 4, 1874. Google Scholar

Brown-Séquard, “De rhemicranie on migraine, par le Dr. dn Bois-Reymond,” Journal de Phye. 1861. Google Scholar

Althann,” Beiträge zur Physiologie und Pathologie der Circulation” Dor-pat, 1871· Google Scholar

* Möllendorff, 4< Ueber Hemicranie,“YirchoVa”Archiv, für path. Anat.” Bd. zìi, p. 885-395. Google Scholar

Hermann mid Escher, Pflüger's “Archiv, für Physiologie,“1870, p. 3. t Landois,” Centralblatt für die med. Wissensch.,” 1865. No. 44; 1867, No. 10. Google Scholar

Bernatzik, “Wiener med. Presse,” 1867. No. 28. Google Scholar

“British Med. Journal,” 1868, vol. ii., p. 360. Google Scholar

* Berger, “Das Amylnitrit, ein nenes Palliativmittel bei Hemikranie,” Berliner klin. Wochenschrift, 1867. No. 2. Google Scholar

* Holet, “Ueber das Wesen der Hemikranie und ihre electro-therapeutische Behandlung nach der polarne Methode.” Dorpater med. Zeitschrift, 1871. Bd. ii, p. 261-228. t “Wiener med. Presse,” 1865, No. 46, p. 1123. Google Scholar

* Benedikt, “Elektrotherapie.” Wien, 1868. Google Scholar

Trommhold, “Die Migraine und ihre Heilung durch Electricität.” Pest, 1868. Google Scholar

Fieber, “Compendium der Elektrotherapie.” Wien, 1869, p. 120. § M. Rosenthal, 41 Handbuch der Diagnostik und Therapie der Nervenkrankheiten,” Erlangen, 1870. Google Scholar

Althaus,44 Treatise on Medical Electricity,” 3rd edition. London, 1873. % Hoist, I.e., p. 275. Google Scholar

* Horner,u Ueber eine Form von Ptosis.“Klin. Monatsbl. für Augenheilkonde. 1869, vii., p. 193; Nicati,” La paralysie du nerf sympathique cervical,” 1873. Google Scholar

Bäerwinkel, “Archiv, für klinisohe Medicin.” 1874, Bd. xiv., p. 649. Google Scholar

Schmid t-Rimpler, “Klin Monatsbl. für Augenheilkunde,” xii., p. 398. Google Scholar

§ “Handbuch der Ophthalmologie,” Bd. v. (1875), p. 98 and 99 (Capitel “ülaucom”). Google Scholar

Benedikt, “Elektrotherapie.” Wien. 1868, p. 253 it Google Scholar

* ν, Gräfe, “Ueber Neuroretini tis,” Archiv fiir Ophthalmologie, 1866. Bd. »i.» ρ 114. Google Scholar

Η Schmidt, “Zur Enstehung der Stauungspapille bei Hirnleiden.” Archiv, für Ophthalmologie, 1869. Bd. xv., ρ 193. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Seeeman (Archiv, für Anat. und Phys 1869, ρ 164) showed that compression of the cavernous sinus is not followed, as v. Gräfe believed, by great engorgement in the retinal veins, as the return of blood, by direct communication with the superficial veins of the face, is quite free enough. Google Scholar

* “Gräfe's und Walther β Journal,” xxix. 1840, ρ 649. Google Scholar

“Nerven lehre,” ρ 570. Google Scholar

* Bränner, “Zur Casuistik der Pathologie des Sympathicus.” Petersburger med. Zeitschrift, N. F. Bd. ii„ 1871, p. 260. Google Scholar

* Bell, “Physiologische und pathologische Untersuchungendes Nerven-système”;” übersetzt von Bomberg, Berlin, 1832. t L.C., p. 364. Google Scholar

“Niederl. Lancet,” Sept. und Okt., 1854, p. 218. See Schmidt's “Jahrbücher,” 1855; 87t«· Band, p. 179 Google Scholar

* Jaccoud, “Bulletin de” la soo. méd. des hôpitaux de Paris Union méd. 1865 (T. XXV.), No. 4, p. 60. See aleo “Leçons de clinique médicale,” p. 861. Google Scholar

14 Archiv, de Phys. normale et pathologique,“I. Sér., 1874, p. 889. t Bemak, <4 Oeeterr. Zeitschrift für practische Heilkunde,” 1862, p. 1 and 29. See also 44 Application du courant constant au traitement des névroses,“Paris, 1865, p. 26. £ Bemak,” Application du courant constant,” p. 28. Google Scholar

* M. Meyer, “Die Elektrioität in ihrer Anwendung auf praefcische Medioin.1 S*® Auflage,” 1868, p. 219. Google Scholar

Driesen, quoted in above book, p. 219. Google Scholar

Fieber, “Beri. klin. Wochenschrift,” 1866, No. 25, p. 261 (ix. Versuch). Google Scholar

§ Benedikt, “Elektrotherapie,” ii. Abth. (Wien, 1866), p. 389. II” Ibidem/1 p. 389-412. Google Scholar

τ Erb, “Arch.für klin. Medicin,” 1867, iii. Band, p. 356. Google Scholar

* Bäerwinkel,” Prager Vierfceljahrschrift für pracfc Heilkunde/' 1858, lix., p. 133. Google Scholar

Voisin, “Gaz. hebd.,» 1863, No. 37;” Gaz. des hôp.,“1863, No. 110, p. 437. X Menjeand,” Gaz. des hôp.,” 18C6, No. 3, p. 10. Google Scholar

Nesemann, “Beri. klin. Wochenschrift,” 1868, No. 37. Google Scholar

* Spielmann, “Gaz. méd. de Strasbourg,” 1862. Mai, No. 5, p. 85 ff. Google Scholar

Duchenne, “Electrisation localisée.” 2 edit., 1861, p. 334. Google Scholar

Stoffella, “Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft der Aertzte,” in Wein, 1865, Heft. 1, p. 85 ff. Google Scholar

§ Griesinger, “Archiv, der Heilkunde,“1864 (6ter Jahrgang;, p. 171. II Benedikt,”Elektrotherapie,“Wien, 1869, p. 186ff. % Menjon,”Med. Chir. Transactions,“Vol. liii., 1852, p. 73 ff. See also Seidel,”Die Atrophia musculorumlipomatosa.“Jena. 1867, p. 64. »* Eulenburg,” Beri. klin. Wochenschrift,” 1865. No. 50; ibidem 1866, No. 37. Google Scholar

‡‡ Barth, “Archiv, der Heilkunde,” 1871, Bd, xii., p. 121. Google Scholar

•• Chvostek, “Oesterr. Zeitschrift für practische Heilkunde,” 1871. No 38-40. Google Scholar

Berger, “Deutsches Archiv, für klin. Medicin,” 1872. Band ix., p. 363. t Casper's “Wochenschrift,” 1840. No. 13 and 14. Google Scholar

“De exophthalmo a struma cam cordis affectione.” Inaagarai Dissert., Berlin, 1855. Google Scholar

“Gaz. hebdom.,” 1860. No. 49. Google Scholar

% “Gaz. Med.,” 1862, p. 474. Google Scholar

§ Naamann, 11 Deatsche Klinik,“1863. No. 24. F. Banks,” Dublin Hosp. Gaz,“1855, No. 9. Fournier et OUivier,” Union Méd.,” 1868, p. 95. Google Scholar

* “Du goitre exophthalmique chez les animaux domestiques.” Comtes ren. dus, 1862. Tome lv., p. 475. See also Virchow,”Die krankhaften Geschwülste/' 1867, Bd. iii., p. 57. Google Scholar

“Extrait du Bulletin de la Soc. de Méd. de Gant.,” 1872. Google Scholar

% “Berliner klinische Wochenschrift,” 1805. No. 27. Google Scholar

§ See Trousseau, “Clinique méd./' T. ii*, p. 540. H” Lancet/' 1869. No. 25. ΐ “Gaz. méd.,” 1856, p. 600. Google Scholar

·· « De Morbo Basedowii.” Inaug. Dissert., Berlin, 1863, p. 27. Google Scholar

Such cases have been observed by Mackenzie, quoted by Fischer, “Archives générales de Méd.,M 1859, p. 652; by Förster, quoted by Lebert,” die Krankheiten der Schilddrüse und ihre Behandlung,11 Breslau, 1862, p. 309; by Schnitzler, “Wiener, Medicinal-Halle,” 1864, No. 27; by Chisholm, “Med. Times and Gaz.,'* 1871, No. 1 : by Emmert,”Archiv, für Ophthalmogie,” 187J, Bd. xvii., p. 218. Google Scholar

» v. Gräfe, “Archiv, für Ophthalmologie,” 1857, p. 292. t “Traité dee Tumeurs de l'orbite.” Paris, 1860, p. 157-223. χ Basedow, 44 Casper s Wochenschrift,“1848, p. 775; Heusinger, *· Casper's Wochenschrift,” 1851, p. 52; Brück, “Deutsche Klinik,“1862, p. 207; Naumann,” Deutsche Klinik,“1853, p. 269; Laqueur,” De Morbo Basedowii,“Inaug. Dies., Berlin, 1860, p. 12; v. Becklinghausen,”Deutsche Klinik,“1863. p. 288; Peter,”Gaz. hebdom,“1864, p. 181; Fournier et Ollivier,” Union méd.,” 1868, p. 95. Google Scholar

§ “Deutsche Klinik,“1864,p. 158; and”Berliner klinische Wochensohrift,” 1867, No 81. Google Scholar

* Basedow, “Casper's Wochenschrift,“1840, p. 222; Praël,”Archiv, für Opthalmologie,“1857, Bd. iii, p. 201; Naumann, loco citato, p. 286; Gräfe,”Archiv, für Ophthalmologie,“1857, p. 285; and”Berliner klin. Wochen, schrift,” 1867, No. 31. Google Scholar

Lavrence, “Gaz. des hòp.” 1858, p. 198; Tatnm, “Med. Times and Gaz./' 1864, 23 January, p. 89; Teissier,”Canstatt's Jahresbericht,“1864, Bd. iv., ρ 173; Patchett,” Lancet,” 1872, Juno 15. Google Scholar

* Bomberg and Henoch, “Klinische Wahrnehmungen und Beobachtungen,” Berlin, 1861, p. 182; Beith, “Med. Times and Gaz.,” 1865, p. 621; Friedrich, “Lehrbuch der Herzkrankheiten,” Erlangen, 1867, p. 312, Trousseau, “Clinique méd.,” Paris, 1868, Tome ii., p. 636; Fournier et Ollivier, “Union med.,” 1869, p. 93; Gildemeester, “Archiv, für die holländischen Beitrage zur Natur und Heilkunde,” Utrecht, 1864, Bd. III., p. 416 and 420; Cheadle, ·'Lancet,“1869, No. 25; Emmert,”Archiv, für Ophthalmologie,” 1871, Bd. xvii, ρ 203 Google Scholar

“Notes, pour servir à l'histoire du goitre exophthalmique,” Gaz. hebdom., 1864, No. 12, p. 180. Google Scholar

Reith, “Exophthalmos—Enlargement of Thyroid Gland—Affection of Cervical Sympathetic,” “Med. Times and Gaz.,” 11 Novr., 1865, p. 521. Google Scholar

William Moore, “Some remarks on the Nature and Treatment of Pulsating Thyroid Gland, with Exophthalmos, '” Dubl. Quar. Jour, of Med. Science,” 1865, p. 344-352. Google Scholar

* Traube and v. Recklinghausen, “Deutsche Klinik,” 1863, No. 29, p. 286. t This case was communicated to us by letter. X Virchow, “Die krankhaften Geschwülste,” Bd. iii., p. 81. § Geigel, “Würzborger med. Zeitschrift,” 1866, Bd. yii., p. 84. II Knight, “Bostcn Med. and Surg. Journal,” 1868, 19 April. % Ganghofner,11 Prager Vierteljahrschrift,” 1876, Bd. cxxx. Google Scholar

Paul, “Berliner klin. Wochenschrift,“1856, No. 27. t Fournier et Ollivier,” Union mèd.,“1868, No. 8 and 9. t Babejac,” Du goitre exophthalmique,“Thèse, Paris, 1869. $ Wilks,” Guy's Hosp. Keports,” 1870, Bd. xv., p. 17 ff. Google Scholar

Chvostek, “Wienermed. Presse,“1869, No. 19; 1871,No.41; 1872,No.23. t M Meyer,” Berliner klin. Wochenschrift,” 1872, No. 39. Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.