Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T17:53:10.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Personality Change and Prognosis After Leucotomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Gerald Garmany*
Affiliation:
Bristol Mental Hospitals

Extract

Though twelve years have now passed since the first prefrontal leucotomy was performed, the status of this form of therapy is still far from settled. There are some who would never perform the operation at all; and some who would reserve it for the chronic sick; while others (Fleming, 1944) would advise its use at an early stage in the illness in cases where there were reasonable grounds for believing that recovery would not otherwise occur. With opposition of a purely emotional kind, the profession as a whole need hardly concern itself; for appeals that the integrity of the nervous system be maintained at all costs are unlikely to impress those whose daily work brings them into contact with the personality degradation of chronic mental illness. It is difficult to see why interference with the brain in order to save sight or to save life in the case of tumour should be regarded as either more or less wicked than interference designed to save human reason.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1948 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerley, S. (1935), Amer. J. Psych., 92, 717.Google Scholar
Cobb, S. (1944), Borderlands of Psychiatry. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. W. T. H. (1944), J. Ment. Sci., 90, 486.Google Scholar
Freeman, N., and Watts, J. W. (1939), Yale J. Biol. and Med., 11, 527.Google Scholar
Idem (1942), Dis. Nerv. Syst., 3, 6.Google Scholar
Idem (1942), Psychosurgery. Baltimore: C. C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Goldstein, K. (1942), After Effects of Brain Injury in War. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Golla, F. L. (1946), Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 39, 443.Google Scholar
Halstead, W. C. (1940), Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 44, 1140.Google Scholar
Idem , Carmichael, H. T., and Bucy, P. C. (1946), Amer. J. Psychiat., 103, 217.Google Scholar
Erickson, Harrower (1940), Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 43, 859.Google Scholar
Hebb, D. O. (1945), ibid., 54, 10.Google Scholar
Kisker, G. W. (1944a), J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 99, 1.Google Scholar
Idem (1944b), Psychosomat. Med., 6, 146.Google Scholar
Rylander, G. (1939), Personality Changes after Operations on the Frontal Lobe. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Spurling, R. G. (1934), South. M. J., 27, 4.Google Scholar
Watts, J. W., and Freeman, W. (1944), J. Neurosurg., 1, 291.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.