Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:25:20.992Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Personality, and Pain Assessment in Childbirth of Married and Unmarried Mothers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

S. B. G. Eysenck*
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, University of London

Extract

Studies which have investigated differences in pain tolerance between extraverts and introverts have reported that the former can tolerate pain better than the latter (Petrie, 1958; Poser, 1960). Nevertheless, behaviourly it was noticed that extraverts appear to complain of pain or discomfort readily and generally to “give voice” to their feelings more than introverts, who incline to “grin and bear it” and make light of past painful experiences. Furthermore, it has been shown in drug studies that subjects react differently to pain inflicted in a laboratory to that caused in other (i.e. natural) ways even if this be more severe (Beecher, 1957). It was therefore decided to investigate this discrepancy by testing subjects undergoing “natural”, i.e. not experimentally inflicted, pain, and women in childbirth seemed a suitable group to approach.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1961 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beecher, H. K., “The measurement of pain”, Pharmacol Rev., 1957, 9, 59209.Google Scholar
Eilenberg, M. D., “A prognostic study of neurotic pregnant patients—Preliminary Communication”, J. Ment. Sci., 1960, 106, 10991104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Routledge ' Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem , Dynamics of Anxiety and Hysteria, 1957. London: Routledge ' Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem , Das “Maudsley Personality Inventory” (M.P.I.), Göttingen. 1959. Verlag für Psychologie Google Scholar
Nigniewitzky, K. D., “A statistical study of rigidity as a personality variable”, 1955. M.A. Degree Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Petrie, Asenath, “Pain sensitivity, sensory deprivation and susceptibility to satiation”, Science, 1958, 128, 14311433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, E., “An investigation into certain personality characteristics of unmarried mothers”, Dissertation Abstr., 1958, 18, No. 6.Google Scholar
Poser, E. G., “Der figural After-Effekt als Persönlichkeitsmerkmal: Theorie und Methodik.” Paper read at International Congress of Psychology at Bonn, 1960.Google Scholar
Scott, E. M., and Thomson, A. M., “A psychological investigation of primigravidae. IV—Psychological factors and the clinical phenomena of labour”, J. Obstet. Gynaec. Brit. Emp., 1956, 63, 502508.Google Scholar
Stewart, D. B., and Scott, E. M., “The assessment of efficiency in labour: psychological factors related to labour”. The Transactions of the Edinburgh Obstetrical Society, Session CV., 1952–1953.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.