Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:11:13.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Persistent Enuresis: A Psychosomatic Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Harry Stalker  and
David Band
Harry Stalker
Affiliation:
Royal Edinburgh Hospital for Mental and Nervous Disorders; University of Edinburgh
David Band
Affiliation:
Western General Hospital and Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh; University of Edinburgh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The congeries of etiological theories and alleged cures that has accumulated round the subject of nocturnal enuresis in children proves only one thing—that we know little of the causes and treatment of enuresis. Since the war many cases of nocturnal enuresis persisting into adolescence and adult life have been seen. Presumably the sufferers were ashamed of their disability and concealed it in peacetime. But wartime conscription, often entailing absence from their homes, has compelled them to reveal it. Such cases of persistent enuresis represent the most severe form of the disorder, and an analysis of the factors involved would seem to be of more value than merely to study enuretic children in general. Once these facts are ascertained, they may throw some light on the universal problem of enuresis in children.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 92 , Issue 387 , April 1946 , pp. 324 - 342
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1946 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addis, R. S. (1936), Proc. R. Soc. Med., 29, 1515.Google Scholar
Anderson, F. N. (1930), Amer. J. Dis. Child., 40, 591 and 818.Google Scholar
Arnesen, J. A. (1924), Norsk mag. f. laegevidensk., 85, 299. Abstract in J.A.M.A., 82, 1828.Google Scholar
Bachus, P. L., and Mansell, G. S. (1944), Brit. Med. J., 2, 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baetjer, F. H., and Waters, C. A. (1921), Injuries and Diseases of the Bones and Joints. H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Band, D. (1945), Brit. J. Urol., 17, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brailspord, J. F. (1929), Brit. J. Surg., 16, 562.Google Scholar
Bray, G. W. (1931), Arch. Dis. Child., 6, 251.Google Scholar
Brookfield, R. W. (1937), Lancet, ii, 623.Google Scholar
Browne, R. C., and Ford-Smith, A. (1941), Brit. Med. J., ii, 803.Google Scholar
Calvin, J. K. (1928), J.A.M.A., 90, 820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, H. C. (1927), Guy's Hosp. Rep., 77, 482.Google Scholar
Christopherson, J. B., and Broadbent, M. (1934), Brit. Med. J., i, 978.Google Scholar
Cushway, B. C., and Maier, R. J. (1929), J.A.M.A., 92, 701.Google Scholar
Delbet, P., and Léri, A. (1925), Rev. Chir., Paris, 63, 483.Google Scholar
Frary, L. G. (1935), Amer. J. Dis. Child., 49, 557.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1930), Three Contributions to the Theory of Sex. New York.Google Scholar
Gordon, J. (1942), Brit. Med. J., i, 357.Google Scholar
Grover, J. I. (1918), J.A.M.A., 71, 626.Google Scholar
Hamill, R. C. (1929), ibid., 93, 254.Google Scholar
Henderson, D. K. (1939), Psychopathic States. London.Google Scholar
Idem (1942), J. Ment. Sci., 88, 485.Google Scholar
Hubert, W. H. de B. (1933), Lancet, i, 1281.Google Scholar
Jemma, G. (1930), Le Spine Bifide. “La Pediatra.” Naples.Google Scholar
Kanner, L. (1935), Child Psychiatry. London.Google Scholar
Karlin, I. W. (1935), Amer. J. Dis. Child., 49, 125.Google Scholar
Köhler, A. (1935), Röntgenology. London.Google Scholar
Langworthy, O. R., Kolb, L. C., and Lewis, L. G. (1940), The Physiology of Micturition. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Laws, G. M. (1937), Amer. J. Obstet. Gynec., 33, 126.Google Scholar
Levine, A. (1943), Amer. J. Psychiat., 100, 320.Google Scholar
McLellan, F. C. (1939), The Neurogenic Bladder. Baltimore.Google Scholar
Michaels, J. J. (1938), Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 8, 460.Google Scholar
Idem (1940), ibid., 10, 501.Google Scholar
Idem (1941), ibid., 11, 260.Google Scholar
Idem (1943), ibid., 13, 644.Google Scholar
Idem and Goodman, S. E. (1938), Arch. of Neurol. and Psychiat., 40, 699.Google Scholar
Idem (1939), Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 9, 59.Google Scholar
Michaels, J. J., and Secunda, L. (1944), Amer. J. Psychiat., 101, 407.Google Scholar
Movitt, S. I. (1936), Urol. cutan. Rev., 40, 496.Google Scholar
Parkhurst, L. E. (1930), Brit. Med. J., ii, 1103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, R. S. (1939), Amer. J. Surg., 43, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, L., and Smith, C. K. (1940), Amer. J. Dis. Child., 59, 1013.Google Scholar
West, J. W. (1927), Journ. R. Army Med. Cps., 48, 38.Google Scholar
Wexberg, E. (1940), Amer. J. Dis. Child., 59, 490.Google Scholar
Wheeler, T. (1920), Carnegie Inst. Contrib. Embryol., Wash., 9, 97.Google Scholar
Willis, T. A. (1924), Surg. Gynec. Obstet., 38, 658.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.